--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 01:28
---
To answer Jakub's question:
> So, what can be done to speed up acceptance of this?
Jim is a GWP maintainer, so once he's happy the patch can go in. Testing on
IA64 definitely seems like a good step. :-)
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32841
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 01:31
---
I'm all for removing optimization options if we don't ever want to turn them
off. Fewer options would be better...
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33107
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33118
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 01:50 ---
I think I'll let Kaveh fix this one...
On hpux and in libiberty, putenv takes a const char * while on other os's
it takes a char *. xputenv doesn't do anything that would affect the
constantness of its argument.
T
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33133
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33138
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33140
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33184
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33185
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33203
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33207
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33213
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33263
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 02:24
---
Since a patch has been checked in, can this issue be closed?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33299
--- Comment #13 from prj-bugzilla-gcc at multivac dot cwru dot edu
2007-09-05 04:49 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I'd certainly like to see this fixed in 4.2.2
Will someone be reviewing and committing this before 4.2.2? I posted it to
gcc-patches with a ChangeLog entry, but there wa
--- Comment #5 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-09-05
05:10 ---
Fixed.
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from ian at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 05:31 ---
Subject: Bug 33029
Author: ian
Date: Wed Sep 5 05:31:37 2007
New Revision: 128119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128119
Log:
PR middle-end/33029
* lower-subreg.c (resolve_clobbe
--- Comment #15 from ian at airs dot com 2007-09-05 05:34 ---
Fixed.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |R
--- Comment #26 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 05:46 ---
This is just one bug, present in GCC 4.1 and onwards, no need to have
several bug ids.
tree-ssa-alias.c just uses ipa_type_escape_field_does_not_clobber_p
incorrectly, it asks an unrelated question and based on the an
--- Comment #4 from ian at airs dot com 2007-09-05 06:03 ---
I haven't looked further at this since this message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01166.html
Testing DECL_EXTERNAL_LINKAGE_P does not make any difference: the compiler
still crashes. The decl in question is
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 06:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think I'll let Kaveh fix this one...
To what exactly do I owe this honor? :-)
AFAICT, this is a -Wwrite-strings error caused by a patch by FX:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/ms
--- Comment #25 from giovannibajo at libero dot it 2007-09-05 06:47 ---
Daniel, can we backport this patch to 4.2, please? It's a P1 regression!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32328
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo