--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 20:16 ---
> The print case is rejected at run time.
My bad. I wanted to write:
print('(a)'), 'Hello'
which is valid code and accepted. (Cf. PR33269 for detecting this.)
> read ('(f3.3)'), a ! Invalid, rejected at compile ti
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 20:17
---
I want to study this a bit. I think it is a bug.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 20:29 ---
What is the official status of this bug?
Mr Jelenik's patch made into the trunk and libstdc++ now at least compiles.
Is that patch just a stop-gap measure and is final solution still outstanding?
A status report or
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 20:05
---
The print case is rejected at run time. See PR28397. IMHO
print('a'), 'Hello' ! Invalid, caught at run time, no leading paren
! in char expr.
write(*,('(a)')) 'Hello' ! Valid, ('(a)') si
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 20:48
---
Point well taken. Tobias, I will work this one unless you wish to do so.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33268
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 21:10 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-08-31 21:34
---
At least on the x86-32, libgcc is currently being built optimized, but the
options are slightly different. the stage1 build does not do
-fomit-frame-pointer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=321
This started to fail on August 25, 2007.
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/hom
e/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa
-linux/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/
src/.libs -B/h
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/hom
e/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa
-linux/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/
src/.libs -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/
--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 23:56
---
Ian, how are we going to fix this? Steven helpfully provided two solutions
but he is no longer a maintainer. The second has been independently tested
several times. I have also tested that reverting your change
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 00:35 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 00:37 ---
Confirmed, related to PR 10852.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Bu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 00:40 ---
I get errors before the ICE:
../src/typelist.hpp:49: error: 'uint' has not been declared
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 00:42 ---
But after fixing the errors, I still get the ICE so reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33239
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 01:12 ---
Breakpoint 1, gen_setmemsi (operand0=0x402a02a0, operand1=0x60175290,
operand2=0x601751d0, operand3=0x601751e0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md:3744
3744
(gdb) p debug_rtx (operand0)
(mem/s/c:QI (plus:SI (re
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 01:29 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct null_type {typedef null_type base_type;};
template
struct tuple_impl
{
template
struct append{
typedef tuple_impl > type;
};
template
struct append{
typedef tuple_impl type;
};
i
--- Comment #2 from sandra at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-01 01:50 ---
Unfortunately I have no pa machine here for testing this myself. Off the top
of my head, I would suggest looking at the part of the patch discussed here,
which was the only part that I thought would change behavior
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
