--- Comment #1 from entrophage at gmail dot com 2007-06-28 01:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=13799)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13799&action=view)
source file to reproduce the bug
compile with:
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -ansi -pedantic -save-temps -o foo foo.c
--
--- Comment #2 from entrophage at gmail dot com 2007-06-28 01:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=13800)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13800&action=view)
preprocessor output of the source file that reproduces the bug
generated with:
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -ansi -pedantic
--- Comment #3 from entrophage at gmail dot com 2007-06-28 01:53 ---
valgrind of the resulting binary shows interesting output:
$ valgrind ./foo
==5107== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==5107== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==5107== Using LibVEX rev
--- Comment #4 from entrophage at gmail dot com 2007-06-28 01:58 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> valgrind of the resulting binary shows interesting output:
this is irrelevant since binary compiled from the following trivial source file
gives the same valgrind errors.
int main()
{
re
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 02:04 ---
No, the comparision is correct.
The enum is you gave is equalivant (in both C and C++) to:
enum X
{
A = 3,
B = 1,
C = 2,
D = 3,
E = 4
};
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
In libiberty/argv.c line 313, function writeargv(), the line "int ret" declares
a variable that is never used in that function. This triggers a warning during
compilation. The following patch should remove that line:
Index: libiberty/argv.c
===
--- Comment #1 from dj at redhat dot com 2007-06-28 02:09 ---
Ok to commit it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32532
--- Comment #3 from pa at panix dot com 2007-06-28 02:09 ---
Not sure this is a duplicate. 28504 is fixed on my box, I need the 2-D VLA to
trigger the ICE.
void foo(void (*p)(int n, int x[n])) {} /* from 28504, ok */
typedef void (*foop)(int n, int x[n]); /* ok */
typedef void (*ice
--- Comment #12 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-28 03:53 ---
Mr Pinski! Thanks for again doing the work for me.
I just had to take some time out for my annual checkup and to rebuild my big
machine's software after Gentoo on shutdown -h now deleted my /bin, /etc, and
/sbin dir
--- Comment #2 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-28 04:45 ---
Iam soory Mr. Schwab but the fno-builtin was provide to me by a fellow
maintainer I am just exhausting all offered approaches to avoid having a
subtraction changed to a libgcc-function/builtin
The flag just disables
--- Comment #2 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2007-06-28 05:23 ---
Fixed, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
--- Comment #7 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2007-06-28 05:25 ---
This problem affects the g5/970 as well:
Darwin. uname -a
Darwin etl-g52.cs.utsa.edu 8.10.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.0: Wed May 23
16:50:59 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.21.3~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
Darwin.
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-28 05:50 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31150
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg02037.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070627 (prerelease)
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_2_branch/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/f951
test.f90 -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -quiet -dumpbase test.f90 -auxbase test -O3
-version -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -I
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_2_branch/build/l
--- Comment #127 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-06-28 06:08 ---
(In reply to comment #126)
> As Andrew pointed out in PR 32521 the valgrind warning was fixed in 4.2.1
> (prerelease). I've now built the 4.2_branch, and the warning is indeed gone,
> but unfortunately the same qs_neig
--- Comment #9 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-06-28 06:48 ---
Monologues don't help. Get your fingers out of the pockets and help us fix
bugs instead of complaining.
Richard has already acknowledged that you found
a bug two days after you filed it (and quite humorously). Your att
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-06-28 06:52 ---
Apparently not a dup.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
