--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:26 ---
Yes how did you configure binutils?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:30 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:30 ---
Mark this as a dup of bug 7948 which is the same issue.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7948 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:30 ---
*** Bug 29125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:32 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:33 ---
*** Bug 29126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:33 ---
To mark as a dup of bug 25802, since this is the same issue as that bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25802 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:47 ---
Actually wait, what is happening here is ADL is happening for fundemantal types
which is a question of a Defect report, I forgot which one now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:49 ---
Actually you missed 14.6.4.2. This really has nothing to do with 14.6.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:51 ---
Also "f (i)" is a dependent expression because of 14.6.2/1 as i is (obviously)
dependent so 14.6.3 does not apply.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:06 ---
So GCC does not implement 14.6.4.2/1, part 1:
- For the part of look using unqualified name lookup (3.4.1), only function
declareations with external linkage from the template context are found.
And since ADL on fun
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:09 ---
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#218
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
/usr/bin/gcc -Wall -pedantic -g -c -o desh.o desh.c
desh.c: In function 'main':
desh.c:256: internal compiler error: in expand_one_stack_var_at, at
cfgexpand.c:515
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
gcc -v:
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-lan
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I believe there alreay is a PR for this. The proper action is to
> suspend it until the issue is completely resolved.
Yes PR 17365.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from de at cs dot brown dot edu 2006-09-19 04:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12293)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12293&action=view)
Preprocessed source.
The preprocessed source file that causes the internal compiler error. Still not
sure exactly w
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:15 ---
This is a dup 25980 which has a better simplier example.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25980 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:15 ---
*** Bug 17045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:16 ---
I am just going to close this as a dup of bug 17365 which is all the same
issues, finding non functions for ADL.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17365 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:16 ---
*** Bug 25980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:19 ---
char input[((size_t)~0 >> 1)];
hehehehehehehe.
Anyways this has been fixed for 4.1.0 by rejecting this code saying there is a
stack (32bit) overflow.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21107 ***
--
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:19 ---
*** Bug 29135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 04:30 ---
This is DR 225 really.
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#225
Which means there is a question if this is really invalid code after all.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:00 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:03 ---
Does hppa-linux-gnu use dwarf2 eh info?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |middle-end
Keywords||EH, wrong-
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:07 ---
The patch which I am thinking might had caused this is:
2006-09-13 Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* flow.c (calculate_global_regs_live): Invalidate eh registers
on eh edges. Renamed invalidate
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:13 ---
This is not a bug but a feature. The reason is that const int usually shows up
in header files and usually are normally unused.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:18
---
I don't know the state of this feature in C++0x at all and I don't know if this
means this is now valid code but only with an option like -std=c++0x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498
--- Comment #13 from steve at telxio dot com 2006-09-19 05:41 ---
I have tried gcc 4.1.1 and I still have the same problem - I tried it on a
different Solaris10 machine than before, with all the latest patches, and got
the same result.
gcc was built with:
PKG_BUILD_GCC_LANGS=c,c++
test
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:49
---
> gcc was built with:
>
> PKG_BUILD_GCC_LANGS=c,c++
> test -d objdir || mkdir objdir
> (cd objdir; ../configure \
> --prefix=/opt/aegis \
> --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as \
>
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 05:58 ---
OK, I finished running make -k check with a i686-linux -> mipsel-linux cross
compiler on my mips board for c, c++, java and there are only the 'normal'
failures (mostly attributable to running the testsuite on a remote
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
