--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:47 ---
Working on a fix.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:51 ---
It's not entirely clear from your report, but this looks like a bug of PR13397?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's not entirely clear from your report, but this looks like a bug of
> PR13397?
No it is not fully related. One of the problems is that we don't remove empty
finnally blocks.
Reduced t
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28814
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:01:28 2006
New Revision: 116439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116439
Log:
2006-08-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:02 ---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.
--- Comment #14 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:11 ---
Testing a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28778
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #8 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-08-25 22:27 ---
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:03:00 -0400
From: Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RFA: Fix PR 28139
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is OK.
:REVIEWURL http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01295.html:
-
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
This was fixed on 2006-08-23, most likely by Jason's fix for PR 23372.
The testcases in PR 27159 and 28372 compile, too.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26963 ***
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
*** Bug 28372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26963
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:46
---
Backporting the patch to the branches was considered to risky, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00804.html
So closing as fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27558
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:47:00 2006
New Revision: 116442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116442
Log:
PR c/27558
Backport:
2006-04-20 Jakub Je
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 28299
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:50:03 2006
New Revision: 116444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116444
Log:
PR c/28299
* c-decl.c (start_function): Don't try
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:52 ---
Subject: Bug 28418
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:52:40 2006
New Revision: 116446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116446
Log:
2006-08-25 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
template derived class cannot access protected variables in template base class
complier: g++ version 4.1.1
error message:
main.cpp: In constructor D::D():
main.cpp:13: error: var was not declared in this scope
(compiling with g++ version 3.2, everything is OK)
Entire test program is liste
Once again (see PR27547) the C++ frontend stumbles over an invalid operator:
struct A
{
operator int&(int);
};
A a;
int& i = a;
n4.cc:3: error: 'A::operator int&(int)' must take 'void'
n4.cc:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28852
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:56 ---
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html.
This is not a bug except in GCCs before 3.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:01 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 23:01:16 2006
New Revision: 116450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116450
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 23:05:20 2006
New Revision: 116452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116452
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
The following testcase triggers an ICE since GCC 4.0.0:
==
template class A> int A<0>::i;
==
bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at
cp/typeck2.c:426
Please submit a full bug r
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28853
on alpha-linux target the unwinder reports sentinel frame.
imho it has no sense.
$ gcc testcase.c -O2; ./a.out
ip = 0x12768
ip = 0x2076860
ip = 0x12668
ip = (nil)
a.out: testcase.c:10: helper: Assertion `ip != 0' failed.
$ cat testcase.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
_Unwind
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:23 ---
Working on a fix.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-25 23:28 ---
the 0x12668 is a last valid return point.
0x00012630 <_start+0>: br gp,0x12634 <_start+4>
0x00012634 <_start+4>: ldahgp,2(gp)
0x00012638 <_start+8>: lda gp,-31092(gp)
0x000
--- Comment #16 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 00:10 ---
Should this be closed as "unlikely to fix in 4.0"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21308
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:11 ---
Not working on 4.0 fix, as noted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00566.html one test fails there
with the patch applied.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:12 ---
Although the patch applies to 4.0 (with fold_build2 (...) changed to fold
(build2 (...))), a different testcase seems to be needed there.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:16 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:16:07 2006
New Revision: 116454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116454
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:23 ---
Subject: Bug 28299
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:22:23 2006
New Revision: 116459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116459
Log:
PR c/28299
* c-decl.c (start_function): Don't try
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28418
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:24:31 2006
New Revision: 116461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116461
Log:
2006-08-25 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 27547
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:25:59 2006
New Revision: 116463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116463
Log:
PR c++/28852
* cp-tree.h (grok_op_properti
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 28852
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:25:59 2006
New Revision: 116463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116463
Log:
PR c++/28852
* cp-tree.h (grok_op_properti
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:30
---
Fixed on mainline. WONTFIX on the branches, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00960.html
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:38
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:37:48 2006
New Revision: 116464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116464
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
Internal Compiler Error / Segmentation Fault when compiling single self-made
header file.
Compiled using cygwin g++ with no options on header file: stats.h
Actual Results: stats.h:625: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Expected: No errors of any kind to show up. Clean compile no output
--- Comment #1 from coolhand2 at gmail dot com 2006-08-26 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12142)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12142&action=view)
Pre-processed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:46
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:45:31 2006
New Revision: 116465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116465
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:59:09 2006
New Revision: 116466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116466
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 01:01
---
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 01:15 ---
patch in testing
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigne
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 01:26 ---
I'm looking at this.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:34
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:36 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:37 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:38 ---
I get a different failure:
t.cc:1: error: void is not a valid type for a template constant parameter
t.cc: In instantiation of const int A< >::i:
t.cc:4: instantiated from here
t.cc:4: internal compiler error:
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:48 ---
My fix was completely wrong. I'll try again.
The problem is that we have
function f
class s
static function g
We never walk into f. So we never find out that it contains g, and g needs a
DIE. Normally,
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:52 ---
This is not a target specific bug either.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:58 ---
GCC only produces a .s file so this is a binutils bug or you are configuring
binutils wrong.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:19 ---
;; Register 120 in 0.
;; Register 121 in 3.
;; Register 122 in 3.
(insn:HI 6 16 10 2 (set (reg/v:DI 120 [ a ])
(reg:DI 3 3 [ a ])) 331 {*movdi_internal64} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 3 3 [ a ])
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:23 ---
*** Bug 25848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:23 ---
powerpc-linux-gnu has the same issue with local alloc.
Actually wait this is the same as PR 25381.
extsw is needed for the ABI as slwi zeros the top 32bits.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25381 ***
--- Comment #3 from bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com 2006-08-26 04:24
---
Ok, I tracked down where the expander is swapping the operands. It's occuring
at simplify-rtx.c:simplify_binary_operation() at line 1459:
/* Make sure the constant is second. */
if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RT
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:26 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC ta
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:37 ---
The load issue is really the same as PR 25553 and this is target independent.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:48 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:45 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC b
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 05:14 ---
Actually the easy way for this to be fixed (maybe) is not to allow DImode in
the fp register class. Though that might fail as we need that to support for
converting between floating point and integers.
--
http:
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 06:37 ---
Patch submitted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 06:41
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Richard, Roger's patch for VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR folding hit mainline now.
And VCE is documented as being undefined for types of different sizes.
maybe we can produce VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR[0] but
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
