[Bug other/25035] [4.1/4.2 regression] libssp causes a failure with cross compilers

--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:18 --- This works for me with a cross (and sysroot) to powerpc-linux-gnu from a i686-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25035

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:20 --- (In reply to comment #14) Any news on the patch? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881

[Bug c++/28255] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with C99 compund literal (scalar), initializer and templates

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:29 --- The type of the CONSTRUCTOR is NULL which is wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28255

[Bug target/28621] [4.1/4.2 Regression] SIGSEGV in set_fast_math () at -Os

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:34 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I applied this patch against the gcc 4.1.1, but the bug is still there (at > least procps keeps segfaulting). 4.1.1 did not have the force_align_arg_pointer attribute so what do you expect

[Bug target/28764] [4.2 Regression] libjava build failure on sh4

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:24 --- This a build regression. This is eh related. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/28683] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE (segfault in add_reg_br_prob_note) when comparing pointers with -O (and higher)

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|blocker http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28683

[Bug c++/28739] [4.2 regression] ICE specializing template member of invalid template class

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:43 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/28740] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid inheritance

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:43 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/28741] [4.2 regression] ICE with static member in invalid template class

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:46 --- Actually I don't think this is fallout of that patch but really of the anonymous namespace changes which added decl_anon_ns_mem_p. Confirmed. Most likely introduced by: 2006-06-29 Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/28743] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid specialization

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:47 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug driver/28528] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Trouble compiling header files with "-x c++" using g++

--- Comment #3 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-08-18 04:48 --- Also, removing the space between '-x' and 'c++' works, eg, g++ -fsyntax-only -xc++ stdio.h but I get warning warning: #pragma system_header ignored outside include file ditto with g++ -c -x c++ std

[Bug driver/28528] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Trouble compiling header files with "-x c++" using g++

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 04:52 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, removing the space between '-x' and 'c++' works, eg, You are correct, weird. Actually: g++ -c -x c++ t.h fails too: --output-pch=t.h.gch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug c/28768] New: Preprocessor doesn't parse tokens correctly?

The following C program will not compile with the command "gcc file.c": #define FIRST "This is a split int main() { printf( FIRST string"); } It gives the expected error message about the malformed preprocessor token. However if the output of "cpp file.c" or "gcc -E file.c" is saved and fed ba

[Bug c/28768] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Preprocessor doesn't parse tokens correctly?

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 05:11 --- Confirmed, a regression from 3.3.3. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Comment #17 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-18 05:15 --- Subject: Bug number PR18111 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00634.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug target/28689] Cross compile internal error.

--- Comment #6 from lee dot adamson at macquarie dot com 2006-08-18 05:27 --- Same thing also happens if I build a sparc-sun-solaris2.8 to i686-pc-linux-gnu cross compiler. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28689

[Bug fortran/28735] Crash in resolve.c - related to contents of .mod

--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-18 05:30 --- Subject: Bug number PR28735 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00635.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug c/28768] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Preprocessor doesn't parse tokens correctly?

--- Comment #2 from beethoven3322 at hotmail dot com 2006-08-18 06:31 --- On a related note, is macro prescanning of arguments part of the ANSI standard? In "Harbison and Steele" they seem to imply argument prescanning in macros is not ANSI-compliant... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug libstdc++/28765] __gnu_cxx::__vstring::clear() is slow

--- Comment #2 from ian at airs dot com 2006-08-18 06:32 --- Unfortunately I do not currently have a valid copyright assignment with the FSF. I think my one word change is fine, but I don't feel comfortable moving a function around (although I agree that is the right approach). --

<    1   2