--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:21 ---
"4.0.3 20051105" fails by rejecting the code.
Likewise for "4.1.0 20060208".
But a real 4.0.3 accepts the code so this is a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:27
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:50
---
Actually I take that back, it is also a problem with targets that don't have
weak symbols too.
On x86_64-linux-gnu with the additional flag of -fno-weak:
pc64:~> g++ test.cc test1.cc -fno-weak
pc64:~> ./a.out
new:
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 05:05
---
-fno-weak worked in 3.0.4 and below, though I don't know if it was really
working so I am not marking this as a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 05:07 ---
[kudzu:~] pinskia% gcc t.c -pedantic-errors -std=c99
t.c:1:7: error: line number out of range
t.c:-1358925197: error: ISO C forbids an empty source file
With -pedantic we just get a warning.
I don't know if we shou
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo