[Bug c++/28088] [4.1 Regression] Internal compiler error on boost mpl test/apply.cpp

2006-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:21 --- "4.0.3 20051105" fails by rejecting the code. Likewise for "4.1.0 20060208". But a real 4.0.3 accepts the code so this is a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/27331] [4.2 Regression] segfault in fold_convert with -ftree-vectorize

2006-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:27 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/28017] lack of guard variables for explicitly instantiated template static data

2006-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 04:50 --- Actually I take that back, it is also a problem with targets that don't have weak symbols too. On x86_64-linux-gnu with the additional flag of -fno-weak: pc64:~> g++ test.cc test1.cc -fno-weak pc64:~> ./a.out new:

[Bug c++/28017] lack of guard variables for explicitly instantiated template static data

2006-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 05:05 --- -fno-weak worked in 3.0.4 and below, though I don't know if it was really working so I am not marking this as a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/28079] #line range not verified without -pedantic

2006-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 05:07 --- [kudzu:~] pinskia% gcc t.c -pedantic-errors -std=c99 t.c:1:7: error: line number out of range t.c:-1358925197: error: ISO C forbids an empty source file With -pedantic we just get a warning. I don't know if we shou

<    1   2