--- Comment #7 from christophpfister at bluemail dot ch 2006-06-03 09:27
---
Further reduced testcase:
---
struct Geometry
{
int type:16;
};
struct Geometry get() {};
int f()
{
struct Geometry test;
return get().type == test.type;
}
---
ICE occurs only with g++,
I get a segfault with 20060530 when building xstow that I didn't get with
20060508. The segfault doesn't show up when I run g++ on the preprocessed
file but pinskia pointed out that I should use --param ggc-min-expand=0
--param ggc-min-heapsize=0, and indeed, when I add --param ggc-min-expand=0
I
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-03 10:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=11587)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11587&action=view)
test case
test case... still fairly large but I've been running delta for 24 hours now
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-03 10:19 ---
Janis, do you think you can do a regression hunt on this bug?
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 11:41
---
Created an attachment (id=11588)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11588&action=view)
Code generated for testcase
See the code generated for this testcase (with my recent patch for improved
out-
--- Comment #4 from gcc at pdoerfler dot com 2006-06-03 12:23 ---
This does not fail with gcc-4_1-branch, Revision: 114325, BTW.
So I'm marking it a 4.2 regression.
--
gcc at pdoerfler dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
I get the following ICE with current gcc 4.2 on mips. It appeared some time
between 20051124 and 20060419. Unfortunately I don't have any compiler
versions inbetween these dates around so I cannot narrow it down further.
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/delta/bin$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -O2 mi
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-03 14:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=11589)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11589&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 15:51
---
Appears to be fixed on mainline and 4.1:
$ gfortran -c pr25706.f90
In file pr25706.f90:4
integer :: x (n)
1
Error: Component 'x' of 'bar' at (1) must have constant array bounds.
--
f
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 16:01 ---
I bet a beer that this was caused by:
2006-03-16 Maxim Kuvyrkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* target.h (struct spec_info_def): New opaque declaration.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 16:07
---
Subject: Bug 27524
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Jun 3 16:06:51 2006
New Revision: 114342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114342
Log:
PR fortran/19777
* trans-array.c (gfc_co
--- Comment #18 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 16:07
---
Subject: Bug 19777
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Jun 3 16:06:51 2006
New Revision: 114342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114342
Log:
PR fortran/19777
* trans-array.c (gfc_c
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 16:07
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 16:08
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2006-06-03 16:41 ---
I also see this on:
alpha1:gcc-obj>uname -a
Linux alpha1 2.4.9-40 #1 Mon Sep 23 08:14:02 EDT 2002 alpha unknown
...
Fixed: widec.h
Fixed: X11/ShellP.h
Fixed: X11/Xmu.h
Fixed: Xm/BaseClassI.h
Fixed: Xm/Traversal.
Between 20060508 and 20060530 gcc 4.2 changed to now longer allow the following
code. This error seems bogus to me.
(sid)3733:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat test.cc
extern "C" void foo(register int *my_perl);
(sid)3734:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] c++ -c test.cc
test.cc:1: error: invalid use of 'register' in
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 17:18 ---
I want to say the patch for PR 26068 caused this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gc
c/ /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla1.f90
-B/mnt/gnu/g
cc-3.3/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/hppa64-hp
-hpux11.11/./libgomp -I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/libgomp/test
--- Comment #12 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 18:30
---
The testcase also fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11:
b,l strlen,%r2
...
.type strlen, @function
At the moment, it's a puzzle to me why this also isn't
failing on the 32-bit ports.
--
d
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-03 19:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27601
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00161.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-03 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27508
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00162.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #31 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 19:47
---
The test will fail on any hppa target with the addition of "-fPIC".
I tend to think the use of the 'X' constraint is bogus, and that the
test should be xfailed on hppa64. While it might be possible to add
support
Configure and bootstrap:
/bin/rm -rf *; ../configure --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline --with-gmp=/opt/local/
--with-mpfr=/opt/local/ ; make -j 16 bootstrap >& build.log
gcc and cctools:
[lindv2:gcc/mainline/objdir64] lucier% gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8
Configured with:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 20:32 ---
Confirmed. Also fails for release checking.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27881
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
Severity|normal
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 20:36 ---
Works for me with r114332 on i686.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 20:38 ---
282 return "$errstatus"
Why put this in quotes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27886
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 20:42 ---
Fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=114341&sortby=date&view=rev
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-03 20:47 ---
I was using revision 114238. Do you know if there has been a change that might
have fixed this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-06-03 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] segfault in
ipa-inline.c, if (e->callee->local.disregard_inline_limits
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, tbm at cyrius dot com wrote:
> I was using revision 114238. Do you know if there has been a chan
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 21:19 ---
Any news?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26188
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-03 21:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=11591)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11591&action=view)
less reduced test case
This (less reduced) test case still shows the segfault with current SVN. It
takes fairly long th
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 21:26 ---
Can you try the patch linked from PR 27735 to see if this fixes this bug also?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:10 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Users using prehistoric kernels and/or glibcs just need to configure
> with --disable-linux-futex.
Why? Shouldn't libgomp figure out itself?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||26175
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever C
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26175
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26477
--- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:13
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Since Honza's patch to emit static and inline functions at -O0, this now fails
> with BOOTCFLAGS as -O0.
Now Honza changed the behavior back to old one for static inline functions but
w
--- Comment #3 from laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com 2006-06-03
22:19 ---
Current GCC does not fail with this error on maintainer mode bootstrap.
However, there are several other issues with objdir != srcdir and missing
dependencies. I'm testing a patch which should solve them.
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:22 ---
This still fails on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:32 ---
This still fails because it hasn't been fixed ;-). My patch for
-feliminate-unused-debug-types only handled casts. It needs further front-end
work to handle enums. At least the infrastructure is in place for the
fro
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:37 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Testing a patch.
Any news, it has been almost a month.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27129
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 23:49 ---
You could add a basic block list scheduler at the tree level just before
out-of-ssa, with heuristics to make life times as short as possible :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855
Take the following example:
typedef __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) float v4sf;
typedef __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) int v4si;
v4sf t;
void
foo (float t1)
{
t = (v4sf)(v4si){1,1,1,1};
t+=t;
}
--
There should be no lvx in it but there is currently because VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
is foldd
--- Comment #10 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 04:28 ---
Subject: Bug 26223
Author: sayle
Date: Sun Jun 4 04:28:25 2006
New Revision: 114355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114355
Log:
PR target/26223
* config/i386/i386.c (construct
48 matches
Mail list logo
