[Bug c++/26917] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with -frepo on invalid code

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1 http://

[Bug fortran/26920] Cannot build using static libraries

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:07 --- This is not a bug with GCC but Darwin does not have the static libraries for libc or even crt0.o for -static compiling. You cannot compile with -static on Darwin. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug libfortran/26712] gfortran on mac intel runtime floating point exception when printing

--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:08 --- 4.1.x is broken for i686-darwin other ways so this is not to be fixed for there. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/26898] Fold does not fold signed + CST1 CMP signed + CST2

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:12 --- It also works for combined CST < CST1 or CST2, i.e. a +- c1 CMP b +- c2 to a CMP b +- c3 where c3 < c2 -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug other/26914] missed optimization / lack of conditional moves

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:16 --- Related to / dup of PR22568. Meta-bug ifcvt sucks. Or cmov sucks on the P4 - whatever you like ;) -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/26939] loop number of iterations analysis confused by what PRE did (PRE is doing its job)

--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:16 --- Won't this get fixed by the patch which patches loop header copy for PR 23855? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/26878] LibJava not compile

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26879 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/26879] LibJava not compile under alpha

--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:18 --- *** Bug 26878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26879

[Bug tree-optimization/26939] loop number of iterations analysis confused by what PRE did (PRE is doing its job)

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:24 --- Yes, probably - though that patch doesn't apply anymore and wasn't reviewed either. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26939

[Bug tree-optimization/26939] loop number of iterations analysis confused by what PRE did (PRE is doing its job)

--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:25 --- Note that the patch for 23855 will only help for invariant conditions in the loop header, while the problem exists also for non-invariant ones. So, as Danny notes, SCEV should be improved to maybe handle this case

[Bug middle-end/22375] fold_builtins creates mis-matched types

--- Comment #2 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:38 --- Subject: Bug 22375 Author: sayle Date: Thu Mar 30 22:37:55 2006 New Revision: 112547 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112547 Log: PR middle-end/22375 * trans.c (gfc_trans_runtime

[Bug middle-end/22375] fold_builtins creates mis-matched types

--- Comment #3 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-03-30 23:01 --- This has now been fixed on mainline, and I've also checked that the extra load mentioned in comment #1 is now also resolved. -- roger at eyesopen dot com changed: What|Removed |Adde

[Bug regression/26928] ICE in in bsi_last, at tree-flow-inline.h:760 on valid code with -march=i686.

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 23:17 --- Even in the sources from today I cannot reproduce this so closing as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/26938] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with wrong number of template parameters

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 23:18 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|norma

[Bug c++/26950] Error diagnostic not issued for unacceptable result of lookup for a name used in a nested-name-specifier

--- Comment #3 from widman at gimpel dot com 2006-03-30 23:31 --- Subject: Re: Error diagnostic not issued for unacceptable result of lookup for a name used in a nested-name-specifier On Mar 30, 2006, at 4:06 PM, widman at gimpel dot com wrote: > > So when I read that excerpt of 3.4

[Bug c++/26957] New: [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

$ g++ -c bug.cc bug.cc: In member function 'void TAO_DynCommon::_ZTv0_n100_N13TAO_DynCommon17insert_longdoubleEN7ACE_CDR10LongDoubleE(CORBA::LongDouble)': bug.cc:28887: internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriat

[Bug c++/26957] [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 23:52 --- Created an attachment (id=11171) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11171&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957

[Bug c++/26957] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/26957] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 00:12 --- This works just fine on x86. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957

[Bug c++/26922] Compile/link failure with -frepo and g++ 4.1

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 00:32 --- Well if you read the instructions on how to report a bug, a tar file is not really liked :). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26922

[Bug libstdc++/26926] double vs. long double libmath export confusion

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 00:33 --- I actually don't see why this is a problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26926

[Bug fortran/21130] 38822 lines of Fortran 90 takes more than 10 minutes to compile on a dual 3GHz P4 Linux box with lots of RAM

--- Comment #12 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 00:47 --- Subject: Bug 21130 Author: bdavis Date: Fri Mar 31 00:47:13 2006 New Revision: 112558 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112558 Log: 2006-03-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bud Da

[Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets

--- Comment #21 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 01:25 --- Subject: Bug 26459 Author: amodra Date: Fri Mar 31 01:25:35 2006 New Revision: 112561 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112561 Log: PR target/26459 * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (CANN

[Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets

--- Comment #22 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 01:27 --- Subject: Bug 26459 Author: amodra Date: Fri Mar 31 01:27:44 2006 New Revision: 112562 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112562 Log: PR target/26459 * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (CANN

[Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets

--- Comment #23 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-03-31 01:54 --- Fixed -- amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug c++/14644] enum of value zero not converted to (null) pointer

--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 02:28 --- As Roger says, this not a bug. Roger's analysis is spot on. (For reference, EDG also rejects this program.) -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/26885] [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object

--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 02:52 --- Jakub -- Sorry about introducing this bug! I'm not sure how best to handle it, but I'll fix it somehow, if you like. I won't have time to work on it for about a week, but I'll be happy to handle it then. If you

[Bug bootstrap/26892] Can't compile a 64-bit gcc

--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-03-31 03:01 --- Subject: Re: Can't compile a 64-bit gcc I don't know. Why does 4.2 use libiconv and 4.1 not use it? (I'm presuming that 4.1 doesn't use it because I was able to build a 64-bit gcc on darwin). Should gcc shi

[Bug bootstrap/22195] Missing Documentation

--- Comment #3 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 03:43 --- FWIW, I am getting the same error with GCC 3.4.6 and I *do have* GNU Texinfo 4.8. I have FSF GCC 3.4.5 sources and I downloaded GCC 3.4.6 diffs for "core" and "g++" - the patches applied successfully, but "make boot

[Bug target/26879] LibJava not compile under alpha

--- Comment #11 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 04:29 --- Created an attachment (id=11172) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11172&action=view) Shell script to help narrow the problem in PR26879. Save this file in a folder. Save "debugx" and "debug" fro

[Bug libfortran/26890] SIZE parameter interacts with same variable in IO list character length specification.

--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 05:11 --- Subject: Bug 26890 Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Mar 31 05:11:03 2006 New Revision: 112570 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112570 Log: 2006-03-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libfortran/26890] SIZE parameter interacts with same variable in IO list character length specification.

--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 05:15 --- Subject: Bug 26890 Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Mar 31 05:15:42 2006 New Revision: 112571 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112571 Log: 2006-03-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug bootstrap/22195] Missing Documentation

--- Comment #4 from dave at joot dot com 2006-03-31 05:23 --- The page at http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html under "Tools/packages necessary for building GCC" does NOT list "Texinfo version 4.4 (or later)" as a requirement. I was not intending to modify GCC (as the requiremen

[Bug bootstrap/22195] Missing Documentation

--- Comment #5 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 05:30 --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I was not intending to modify GCC (as the requirements for modifying it do > list > Texinfo). I was intending to compile it. Out of the box compile on my system > failed, and Ranjit's s

[Bug c++/26950] Error diagnostic not issued for unacceptable result of lookup for a name used in a nested-name-specifier

--- Comment #4 from widman at gimpel dot com 2006-03-31 05:36 --- Subject: Re: Error diagnostic not issued for unacceptable result of lookup for a name used in a nested-name-specifier On Mar 30, 2006, at 11:47 PM, Daveed Vandevoorde wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2006, at 4:06 PM, James Widma

[Bug tree-optimization/26859] [4.2 Regression] ICE Segmentation Fault

--- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 07:16 --- Fixed on mainline. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/26830] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Insane amount of compile-time / memory needed at -O1 and above

--- Comment #24 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-03-31 07:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Insane amount of compile-time / memory needed at -O1 and above > Note that the regression is in 4.1, too, so we should consider backporting > changes that accumulate

[Bug bootstrap/26936] fix-header segfault with glibc-2.4 header

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 07:50 --- Subject: Bug 26936 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 31 07:49:59 2006 New Revision: 112573 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112573 Log: 2006-03-31 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug bootstrap/26936] fix-header segfault with glibc-2.4 header

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 07:50 --- Subject: Bug 26936 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 31 07:49:59 2006 New Revision: 112573 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112573 Log: 2006-03-31 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

<    1   2