--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Is that the exact output?
>
> Yes, of course!
>
I assum you tried to compile f95files/intvec.F90. I have no problem with it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tonto]$ perl Makefile.
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Is that the exact output?
Yes, of course!
I assum you tried to compile f95files/intvec.F90. I have no probl
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 23:33
---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] Gfortran can't compile tonto
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
> (In reply to comment
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 23:57 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 00:14 ---
I(In reply to comment #11)
> Subject: Re: [meta-bug] Gfortran can't compile tonto
>
>
> On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:2
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 00:19 ---
I'm not certain that this should be fixed in Classpath.
After all, Classpath doesn't use svn.
I have a fix for libgcj which I will check in soon.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
Building SVN rev 112107 of gcc/trunk on my PowerPC G4 OS X 10.3.9
(powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0)
/Users/perrin/gcc_MAINLINE/gcc/configure
--prefix=/Users/perrin/gcc_MAINLINE/INSTALL/112107/ --enable-languages=c
--enable-threads=posix --disable-multilib
and then
make -j 2 bootstrap && make install
--- Comment #7 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 01:21 ---
Subject: Bug 26557
Author: sayle
Date: Thu Mar 16 01:20:57 2006
New Revision: 112111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112111
Log:
PR middle-end/26557
* stmt.c (emit_case_nodes):
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 01:42 ---
Subject: Bug 26142
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Mar 16 01:42:24 2006
New Revision: 112114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112114
Log:
2006-02-22 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 01:54 ---
Subject: Bug 26688
Author: tromey
Date: Thu Mar 16 01:54:51 2006
New Revision: 112115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112115
Log:
PR libgcj/26688:
* lib/Makefile.in: Rebuilt.
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 01:58 ---
Subject: Bug 26688
Author: tromey
Date: Thu Mar 16 01:58:38 2006
New Revision: 112116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112116
Log:
PR libgcj/26688:
* lib/Makefile.in: Rebuilt.
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 01:59 ---
I fixed this in GCC svn.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 02:16 ---
You need a newer cctools.
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/cctools-590.12.dmg
works for me on 10.3.9 just fine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 02:48 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 02:49 ---
"Added canonical iv..." seems correct to me (at least, -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon
does not fix the problem). However, -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon -fno-ivopts fixes
it, so it is mine anyway.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 03:15 ---
Actually, my previous comment is wrong, it is ivcanon (more precisely, # of
iterations analysis). Consider this testcase:
#include
void bla(int x)
{
if (x < -100)
exit (0);
}
int main(void)
{
int bits = 2
--- Comment #8 from mdorey at bluearc dot com 2006-03-16 04:31 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Nathan could you comment on this bug.
Two years with no comment. Is it because the Severity is set to Enhancement?
I'm convinced that the warning is incorrect, not missing, so I think the
Sev
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 05:08
---
PR23634 does not affect this PR. So only two bugs left. I checked by
commenting out the lines effecting compiling.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 05:35 ---
Hmm, related to PR 13983.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThis
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 05:36 ---
And to PR 17519.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
