--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24519
--- Comment #12 from diskman at kc dot rr dot com 2006-03-07 04:12 ---
Did I scare everyone off? I have a feeling that the GCC-4.x Fortran code may
have never worked on the Alpha... I could be wrong...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26564
--- Comment #13 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-03-07 04:17 ---
Subject: Re: ../.././libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh: Unknown type
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:12:10AM -, diskman at kc dot rr dot com wrote:
>
> Did I scare everyone off? I have a feeling that the
I compiled this trivial function on the OS X 10.3.9 g++ compiler, which is
still only version 3.3. With the optimizer enabled -O2, the compiler hangs.
Without optimization, the compile succeeds.
Code:
int f(int x) {
return 1 / (x ? 1 : 0) ;
}
GCC VERSION:
gcc version 3.3 20030304 (Ap
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 04:43 ---
This works in 3.3.2 with the FSF GCC. Please report this bug to Apple first
since it is their modified version of gcc.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 07:16
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Did I scare everyone off?
> I have a feeling that the GCC-4.x Fortran code may
> have never worked on the Alpha... I could be wrong...
We have had reports of successful building on a
--- Comment #13 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-03-07
07:28 ---
Subject: RE: EQUIVALENCE broken in 32-bit code with optimization -O2
Andrew,
Oh, I did miss something, then!
> The symptom of this testcase passing might work but the bug
> is still there and
> most
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
