--- Comment #24 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-02-22 22:11 ---
Submitted patch to fix this
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01705.html
--
mrs at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from olh at suse dot de 2006-02-22 22:14 ---
what I have found so far is: -O2 and -Os fails, -O1 boots
another thing:
I moved the kernel tree around, and after this move and a clean rebuild with
the very
same gcc41 sources, the kernel boots again. I'm using O=../somdir, wh
--- Comment #1 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 22:21 ---
Actually, the problem you are describing is that call clobbering is not per
call (IE context-sensitive), so that it believes something clobbered somewhere
means it is clobbered everywhere.
--
dberlin at gcc dot g
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 22:28 ---
Ah, and that is even correct. Because the objects escape here, so we cannot do
better (without IP escape analysis).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26429
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 22:51
---
Set back to P3 so that I will be sure to reconsider it.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Syntax error when attempting to use the built-in macro __FUNCTION__ in the
catch handler of a try/catch block where the try/catch wraps a template class'
constructor and includes the member initializer list.
-
gcc configure:
Configur
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 23:04 ---
Then this is a dup of bug 23384.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23384 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 23:04 ---
*** Bug 26429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 23:29
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> am i crazy?
Can you read:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=103163
Before replying again?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26428
--- Comment #3 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-22
23:43 ---
Any plans to add _LARGE_FILES support to g++/libstdc++ for AIX?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20366
Hi,
Following code gets ICE.
elm3b11:/home/pawar> cat test.c
typedef struct _A2 A2;
struct _A2 {
int type ;
int n1 ;
int n2 ;
int inc1 ;
int inc2 ;
double *entries ;
};
double
A2_infinityNorm (
A2 *mtx
) {
double norm ;
int ncol, nrow ;
if ( (nrow = mtx->n1) <= 0 || (ncol
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 00:06 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed.
> It worked with "4.2.0 20060215".
>
It works with GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060219 on FC3/Athlon
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409
While trying to build matplotlib-0.87 on HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 with gcc-3.4.3:
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2
-I/opt/TWWfsw/python235p/include/python2.3 -fPIC -I/opt/TWWfsw/libttf21/include
-I/opt/TWWfsw/libpng12/include -I/opt/TWWfsw/zlib11/include -I.
-I/opt/TWWfsw/pytho
--- Comment #1 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
00:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=10893)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10893&action=view)
.s file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
00:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=10894)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10894&action=view)
.i file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #20 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-02-23 00:41
---
Created an attachment (id=10895)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10895&action=view)
updated for powerpc and powerpc64
Jakub of course is correct that the vdso eh_frame dwarf2 can't increment
--- Comment #21 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 01:01 ---
No. MFUC only applies when there is no unwind information available. When
the vdso is present, unwind information is available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26208
--- Comment #22 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-02-23 01:08
---
Richard, aren't you confusing MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR with
MD_FROB_UPDATE_CONTEXT? The former only happens when we have no unwind, the
latter on each uw_update_context.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
I've been trying to get gcc-4.0.2 to build on our AMD64 box. I'm using gcc-3.4
to bootstrap it. After successfully completing the first 3 stages, gcc fails
in building the java area with:
/afs/ir/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/@sys/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/afs/ir/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/@
--- Comment #1 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-23 01:25 ---
Oh, and here are my configure options:
configure '--datadir=${prefix}/lib' '--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib'
'--sharedstatedir=${prefix}/lib' --prefix=/usr/pubsw --enable-threads --wi
th-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/pubsw/bin/as
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 01:34 ---
What version of binutils are you using?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 01:38 ---
I bet this is really just PR 25937 again exposed with a different testcase and
improvements to other parts of GCC.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #4 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
01:38 ---
$ /opt/TWWfsw/gcc343/ia64-hp-hpux11.23/bin/as --version
GNU assembler 2.16
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU Gene
--- Comment #5 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
01:39 ---
Looking at gas/Changelog between 2.16 and 2.16.1, I see:
2005-05-19 Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/tc-ia64.c (dot_endp): Don't use global symbol for unwind
relocations in u
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 01:44 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 3.3.
In 4.0 and above we get either the following two errors:
On GNU/Linux:
/tmp/cc9KVEBk.o: In function
`Test::Test()':t.cc:(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN4TestIiEC1Ev[Test::Test()]+0x33):
undefine
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 01:47 ---
Does -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing works?
Does -O2 -fno-tree-vrp works?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:12
---
Thought we had this fixed. Will have to look again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:24
---
Well its at the 8192 boundary again similar to pr25835. In that case we needed
to flush the buffers at the end of a read. I will look further.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423
--- Comment #6 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10896)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10896&action=view)
.s file (gcc-4.0.2 with as 2.16.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #7 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=10897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10897&action=view)
.i file (gcc-4.0.2 with as 2.16.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:39
---
Subject: Bug 26291
Author: reichelt
Date: Thu Feb 23 02:39:24 2006
New Revision: 111380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111380
Log:
PR c++/26291
* decl.c (grok_op_properties)
--- Comment #8 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:41 ---
gcc-4.0.2 with either as 2.16/2.16.1 generates no warning.
gcc-3.4.3 with either as 2.16/2.16.1 generates the warning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:52
---
Now also fixed on the 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:56 ---
Can you try 3.4.5?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summa
--- Comment #10 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
03:02 ---
Sure. It might take a few days.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 04:02
---
I should also point out you did not follow the instructions on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
Which explicitly point out what is requested of you for filing a bug report.
1. Source code that will compile (your exam
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 06:27 ---
and with "4.2.0 20060222".
Where's the bug, chaps?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
