--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:46
---
Due to the fact that the problem occurs with inline asm, not ordinary C code,
I'm making this P2, rather than P2. I've pre-approved a patch for this
problem.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:49
---
I'm currently testing a patch for all of the critical problems in this PR;
we'll be left with an accepts-invalid regression, which would only be P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:50
---
This is too obscure to be a P1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #18 from falk at debian dot org 2006-02-18 07:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=10870)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10870&action=view)
alternative patch
Hi,
I've also been working on a patch, although as an SSA pass. It probably catches
more, but there
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:22
---
Created an attachment (id=10871)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10871&action=view)
Updated patch.
Updated patch to fix problem found in Comment #16
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
noticed while playing with uClibc/alpha port ... a function that was defined as
being hidden/weak causes build failures for alpha but no other target.
testing mostly on my amd64 box cross-compiling for alpha/uclibc, but a native
alpha/glibc compiler exhibits the same issues. tested gcc 3.4.5, 4.0
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-02-18 07:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=10872)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10872&action=view)
alpha-hidden-weak.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26347
I'm seeing bootstrap failing on x86 and amd64-linux:
WORK Thu Feb 16 21:06:28 UTC 2006 (revision 51)
FAIL Fri Feb 17 12:16:43 UTC 2006 (revision 80)
FAIL Fri Feb 17 20:56:47 UTC 2006 (revision 111208)
...
/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-head-20060217T133449/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work
* stmt.c (decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p): Use DECL_HARD_REGISTER
instead of DECL_REGISTER.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20060217-1.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20060217-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-br
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:54
---
Just so everyone understands. I am working one more modification to this patch
to allow 63 character long names in the tests for logical true or false in
namelist reads. The patch in Comment #18 works for all c
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:58
---
This test can sometimes fail if you have a lot of background tasks running.
Check the tolerance on the timing accuracy and see if increasing that allows
the test to pass. I have seen it do this before. Or is th
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
