--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-12 01:47 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 01:56 ---
gcc.c-torture/execute/2822-1.c fails the same way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24959
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 01:57 ---
I will submit this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assigne
--- Comment #33 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-12 02:49 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> As I said before, there is still a diagnostic issue and now it is worse
> with
> doing that in the front-end since people don't read docs that well so
> we will
> be getting bug reports abou
The fix is:
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c (revision 109602)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@ -6680,6 +6682,8 @@ output_pic_addr_const (FILE *file, rtx x
break;
case SYMBOL_REF:
+ if (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x))
+
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 05:25 ---
See 14.1.2.1.
A common block name in a scoping unit also may be the name of any local
entity other than a named constant, intrinsic procedure, or a local variable
that is also an external function in a functio
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 06:46
---
This is interesting. I noticed before that with the previous test case i could
get two different error message depending on the size of the data. I will have
to study this a bit closer.
BTW Thanks for the test
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
