--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 23:56 ---
Confirmed, very much related to PR 19774.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:16 ---
Mine.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:16 ---
I still want this.
Someday...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:32 ---
Subject: Bug 25283
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Dec 7 00:31:58 2005
New Revision: 108143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108143
Log:
PR java/25283:
* parse.y (patch_new_array_init)
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:34 ---
Subject: Bug 25283
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Dec 7 00:34:36 2005
New Revision: 108144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108144
Log:
PR java/25283:
* parse.y (patch_new_array_init)
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:35 ---
Subject: Bug 25283
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Dec 7 00:35:06 2005
New Revision: 108145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108145
Log:
PR java/25283:
* parse.y (patch_new_array_init)
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:38 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UN
--- Comment #8 from billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 01:08
---
I can confirm this works for me on trunk.
--
billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that it uses fold_ternary (type, COND_EXPR, cond,
op1, op2) and that it could remove code which is already done in fold_ternary.
A patch like
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00153.html
will work but it needs to be reworked for the changes which made it in
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 03:12 ---
Once fold does (a&b)!=0?a|b:a to a and PR 25290 is fixed then this will be
caught at the tree level. There are most likely others like this too.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 03:23 ---
I should note that the first testcase in comment #0 in the bug is fixed but not
the second, non reduced one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 03:54 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Subject: Re: builtin *printf handlers are confused by -fexec-charset
> "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Backporting this fix to 3.4 requires also backporting
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 04:13 ---
Fixed in 4.2.0 by:
2005-11-24 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gcse.c (hash_scan_set): Look through REG_EQUAL or REG_EQUIV notes
also when doing PRE, rather than only for global CPROP.
--
pi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 04:14 ---
This is only an if conversion failure now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 04:34
---
Closing as invalid based on the resolution of the Defect report making this
code invalid and should be rejected as GCC does.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 05:16
---
I have found the offending code. I am working on the fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25264
--- Comment #12 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-12-07 05:50
---
pr25212 has a more complete fix that I propose applying to the 4.1 branch.
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 06:06 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Showstopper.
>
What is the status on this one?
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24793
--- Comment #22 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 06:20 ---
Subject: Bug 15809
Author: pault
Date: Wed Dec 7 06:20:21 2005
New Revision: 108150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108150
Log:
2005-12-07 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo