--- Comment #4 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-28 05:10
---
I could not reproduce this using 4.0.3 20051120. I suspect a header/library
mismatch or somesuch. Why are you using -lrtgcc? Normally, you would use -lrt
on a powerpc-linux system.
--
amodra at bigpond dot
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17352
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:17
---
I should note that libunwind has at least a way to dynamicly add unwinding
info. I don't know if libgcc has this ability, maybe it should be added.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23278
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:18
---
No feedback in over two years now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:20 ---
No feedback in over 3 months.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2005-01-11 16:18:25 |2005-11-28 05:21:
--- Comment #3 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:22 ---
One problem with this proposal is that sometimes the user just wants one actual
error (the C++ error messages are multiline, but are still one message) and it
is difficult to estimate what a good value of is to ensure t
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:26 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24466 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:26 ---
*** Bug 24563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24466
--- Comment #5 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-28 06:13
---
Created an attachment (id=10351)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10351&action=view)
Failing preprocessed source code (gzipped)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 07:08
---
No, it's in fact easier than that. We shouldn't come into us_read for this
file, which is formatted! Probably a bad default flag is set.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remove
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 07:11 ---
<>
No, the compiler is giving you a list of source files, so you should only
include those source files, and verify that the bug can indeed
be reproduced with these sources only (some additional source files
may sti
--- Comment #3 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-11-28 07:20 ---
Reopened to ...
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
/*
* gcc-3.4 -O2 miscompiles this program on armv5b-unknown-linux:
* a negative value for y is passed to I_lshift(), but I_lshift()
* behaves as though y is non-negative (chooses the wrong branch
* of the second if-statement).
*
* The original code comes from the bignum support code in the
*
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 07:29 ---
Subject: Bug 20219
Author: uros
Date: Mon Nov 28 07:29:43 2005
New Revision: 107597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107597
Log:
PR middle-end/20219
* fold-const.c (fold binary) :
--- Comment #5 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-11-28 07:32 ---
... close as FIXED.
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo