--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 00:22
---
Subject: Bug 23644
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-08 00:22:20
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
--- Comment #5 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 00:25 ---
Mine. IA-64. Confirmed. A typo in the patch adding docs for this option.
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 00:31 ---
Fixed on the gcc-3.4.x branch, the gcc-4.0.x branch, and mainline (gcc-4.1).
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 01:08 ---
A regression hunt with an i686-linux cross compiler identified this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-09/msg01078.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24260
The following simple program is rejected by gfortran
(commandline: gfortran junk.f)
with this error message:
In file junk.f:6
* 1.4)
1
Error: Period required in format string at (1)
In file junk.f:4
write(6,10) x
1
Error: FORMAT label 10 at (1) not d
Srujan.K.V.S. wrote:
The following is the program to print magic squares.I`m getting
wierd output when i remove the printf statement "printf("a")" from the
code.
Please see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
for info on how to submit bug reports.
You did not include enough info for us to do
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:24
---
Confirmed on latest 4.1 cvs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24268
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:33
---
Subject: Bug 23150
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-08 03:33:46
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog calls.c
Log message:
PR
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:34 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:36 ---
I just checked in a fix for PR 23150, which is probably duplicate of this PR.
Could somebody test the current mainline now on powerpc?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090
I checked out gcc from cvs today (2005-10-07). I configured with
~/src/gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/gcc --with-mpfr=/Users/eschnett
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java,objc,treelang
and then said
make bootstrap
After some time, this fails with many (about 200) lines of
tail: +16c: No such f
I am using
$ /Users/eschnett/gcc/bin/gfortran --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.0 20050925 (experimental)
with the options
/Users/eschnett/gcc/bin/gfortran -mlongcall -g3 -O2 -funroll-loops -Wall
-Wshadow -Wsurprising -c -o $current_wd/AHFinder_exp.F.o
$current_wd/AHFinder_exp.f
which leads to
--- Comment #1 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-10-08 04:45
---
Created an attachment (id=9929)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9929&action=view)
Failing source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24270
--- Comment #2 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-10-08 04:46
---
Created an attachment (id=9930)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9930&action=view)
Necessary module source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24270
--- Comment #33 from ian at airs dot com 2005-10-08 05:04 ---
I found the bug report which led to the patch which is the issue in this PR.
It starts here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg00796.html
and ends with this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 05:45 ---
This is a dup of bug 14251.
I am assuming that you installed a GNU version of coreutils which was "broken".
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14251 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 05:45
---
*** Bug 24269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 05:47 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #34 from ian at airs dot com 2005-10-08 05:51 ---
I am able to recreate the problem with a hppa64-hp-hpux11 cross-compiler, in
the sense that combine does lose the REG_DEAD note when compiling the
gcc.c-torture/compile/920501-13.c test case with -O1. In the current compiler,
/opt2/linux/ix86/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --program-suffix=-4.0.2
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/opt2/linux/ix86
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--with-sys
--- Comment #1 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 05:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=9931)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9931&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24271
/opt2/linux/ix86/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --program-suffix=-4.0.2
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/opt2/linux/ix86
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--with-sys
--- Comment #1 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 06:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=9932)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9932&action=view)
preprocessed file (gziped)
preprocessed file that is mentioned in the linker error as having created the
invalid re
--- Comment #2 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 06:07 ---
/opt2/linux/ix86/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/g++ -fvisibility=hidden
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -save-temps -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -m64
-I/opt2/linux/x86_64/include -O3 -g -pipe -m64 -I/opt2/linux/x86_64/include
-D_R
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
