--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
08:59 ---
A pedwarn might be the way to go, but I don't feel strongly about it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
09:34 ---
Add the PR for Paolo Bonzini's SSE regalloc improvements patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Bu
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
09:46 ---
Can you elaborate on why the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR experiment failed and perhaps
attach the patch you tried? Or does using VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR just expose that
we don't do structure propagation?
--
http://gcc
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
11:27 ---
Subject: Bug 23725
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 11:27:13
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog error.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
11:28 ---
2005-09-15 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/23725
* error.c (dump_decl): Use USING_DECL_SCOPE.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
11:36 ---
I haven't backported anything recently.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nathan at g
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-15 11:39
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Yes, it does not work when configuring gcc with --with-cpu=pentium4 see PR
19161.
No, the patch works OK for pentium4. The remaining problem is in
optimize_mode_switching() function.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-15 11:53
---
He problem is in following RTL:
(insn 30 29 31 1 (set (reg:V4SI 75)
(mem/u/i:V4SI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2]) [3 S16 A128]))
541 {*movv4si_internal} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_vecto
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 12:00
---
PAtch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-09/msg00314.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23420
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 12:39 ---
I would dearly love to be able to say -Woverzealous-qualification
or something like that to turn on this warning.
It would make keeping our code portable much easier.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
13:04 ---
Dan, why can't you use -pedantic? That's the best way of avoiding gnuisms.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 13:09 ---
Pain. We have a very large application, and we cannot
afford to fix all the warnings -pedantic gives.
This is another case of "we want to turn on and off individual warnings,
please".
We're getting mighty tired of
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 13:11 ---
Also, the non-gcc compiler we're trying our code with supports
some but not all gnuisms, so -pedantic would actually cause
us to fix much more of our code than is practically neccessary
for the kind of portability we
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-09-15 13:32
---
I get the same bug on darwin8.2.0, with 768MB of ram
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
13:46 ---
if these ints are signed, you should be able to remove these loops.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23361
bootstrap fails with 4.1.0-20050915T1259UTC snapshot.
(...)
mkdir -p ada/bldtools/sinfo
cp -p ../../gcc/ada/sinfo.ads ../../gcc/ada/xsinfo.adb ada/bldtools/sinfo
(cd ada/bldtools/sinfo; gnatmake -q xsinfo.adb ; ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h )
raised XSINFO.DONE : xsinfo.adb:110
make[2]: *** [ada
Who has the answer to the following issue:
case OPT_USER:
struct passwd *userInfo = (struct passwd *) malloc(sizeof(struct passwd));
Produces the following error:
find.c:390: error: parse error before "struct"
But when I insert another statement:
case OPT_USER:
printf("");
stru
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
13:59 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you elaborate on why the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR experiment failed and perhaps
> attach the patch you tried? Or does using VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR just expose that
> we don't do structure
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-09-15 14:02
---
Expanding slightly, I tried the following 4 functions. All were removed by
-funsafe-loop-optimisations,
but only foo3 was removed by -O3 without -funsafe-loop-optimisations. I can't
see a good reason to
re
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:13 ---
Subject: Bug 23891
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 14:13:06
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog java-tree.h jcf-parse.c par
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 14:19
---
Fixed checked in to HEAD, but this should also be applied to 4.0 branch because
its a regression from 4.0.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23891
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23891
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:22 ---
Small testcase:
void f(int i)
{
switch (i)
{
case 1:
struct a *b;
}
}
But IIRC this is invalid code as variable defintions are not allowed right
after a label.
void f(int i)
{
a:
struct
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:22 ---
*** Bug 23895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:23 ---
Reopen to ...
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENE
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:23 ---
Mark as a dup of bug 7508.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7508 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 14:23
---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
in class
I wouldn't mind turning this diagnostic on by default as a pedwarn. As
usual, people who want their code to build anyway can use -fpermissive
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:23 ---
*** Bug 21689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aeby at graeff dot com 2005-09-15 14:24
---
I don't think this bug is linked with 23758. No matter if you call unsafe
procedures before or after fork() SIGCHLD ist still blocked at the point where
execvp() is called. It seems the posix-threads code does expli
--- Additional Comments From paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2005-09-15 14:25 ---
I did not want to mess around by submitting from a Windows machine again, so
here is a preview of a proposed patch:
==
--- Additional Comments From aeby at graeff dot com 2005-09-15 14:27
---
Created an attachment (id=9734)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9734&action=view)
workaround: patch against GCC 4.0.1 unblocking SIGCHLD before execvp()
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:27 ---
I am just going to mark this one as a dup of bug 22156, because it is the same
problem, just different
testcases.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22156 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:27 ---
*** Bug 22157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Bug 22156 depends on bug 22157, which changed state.
Bug 22157 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] struct copying code gen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:48 ---
It might be just the time to move x86 over to HWI being 64bit like all other
sanse targets, especially
when it uses 128bit constants.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23831
Hi,
with Debian's gcc (version 4.0.2 20050913 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-7)) this
doesn't compile anymore:
const std::pair p(1, 2);
int i, j;
boost::tie(i, j) = p;
It works with all older versions and MSVC 7.1.
Cheers,
André
--
Summary: boost::tie()
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
14:54 ---
See PR 14981 for another one which was caused by the same issue before.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23831
--- Additional Comments From Woebbeking at web dot de 2005-09-15 14:54
---
Created an attachment (id=9735)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9735&action=view)
example code, save-temps and compiler error message
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23896
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
15:14 ---
Even after the fix for PR 23691, this still fails. It worked with "4.0.2
20050826".
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
15:15 ---
It also fails with "4.1.0 20050903".
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0 Regressi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
15:21 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23896
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot|debian-gcc at lists dot
|de |debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:03 ---
Subject: Bug 13140
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 16:03:33
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/tests
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:22 ---
Reduced as far as I could do:
namespace boost{
template struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE {};
struct null_type;
template
class tuple;
template struct cons {
typedef TT tail_type;
};
templat
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:40 ---
This is much better now but still more improvements can happen. I am going to
unassign Daniel for
now as the aliasing pass takes much less now.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:49 ---
on x86_64, there is only about 2x compile time increase at -O3. Though it is
much faster now, than it
was a couple of days ago.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23835
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 16:49 ---
We build everything with -Werror so errors are flagged as
fatal. If we added -pedantic, we'd have to stop using
-Werror, and implement the fatal error check ourselves in
a wrapper, which would be a huge pain.
gcc-4.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:50 ---
Looking at the numbers for -fno-inline, I noticed it drops back down to the
4.0.0 numbers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23835
A nice, probably straightforward improvement: adding those would enable the
range of optimizations mentioned in the first half of the paragraph "vector
Example" of N1377 (first, v7-branch only, of course)
--
Summary: Add move constructor/assignment to basic_string
Product: g
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
17:27 ---
Subject: Bug 23875
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 17:27:24
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-15 17:28
---
Fixed for 4.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
copy_bb_p uses uncond_jump_length in order to gauge
when code increase will be negative or neglegible
(at -Os) or acceptable (at -O2); however,
uncond_jump_length has the wrong value.
According to the comment in reorder_basic_blocks, it
expects to get a minimal length for an unconditional
jump when
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 17:50
---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
in class
dank at kegel dot com wrote:
> gcc-4.1 had a stated goal of giving every warning a name,
> and letting them be turned on and off individually.
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
17:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=9736)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9736&action=view)
fix for SH
This patch set fixes the problem for the SH.
The patch to sh_output_mi_thunk should no longer
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-15 17:56
---
This is what I come up with:
---
template struct X {};
template struct length {
static const int value = 2;
};
template void foo () {
sizeof(X::value>);
}
template void fo
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
18:05 ---
Darn, I should never have fixed that original PR. Silly me, trying to fix bugs.
Mine.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16540
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22150
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |0.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20015
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 18:25
---
Can I close this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23734
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 18:25
---
This looks fixed now. Can I close this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22554
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-09-15
18:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] pb_assoc header build and install overflows exec
> bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
Ben> This looks fixed now. Can I close this?
Yes, the latest version appea
--- Additional Comments From price at ifa dot hawaii dot edu 2005-09-15
18:44 ---
To get it to compile, use curly brackets after the "case":
case 1:
{
int y = 7;
}
I would suggest that the existence of several duplicates argue for a clearer
error message.
--
http
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-09-15 18:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] make[4]: execvp: /usr/local/bin/bash: Arg list
too long
> Can I close this?
Yes.
Enabling large_ncargs_enabled after applying patch PHKL_16750
resolves the problem.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
18:59 ---
Subject: Bug 22205
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 18:58:04
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
18:59 ---
Subject: Bug 21674
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 18:58:04
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
18:59 ---
Subject: Bug 2
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 18:58:04
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 18:59
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
Bug 23734 depends on bug 22554, which changed state.
Bug 22554 Summary: [4.1 Regression] pb_assoc header build and install overflows
exec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22554
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
19:10 ---
Subject: Bug 23139
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 19:09:28
Modified files:
fixincludes: ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-15 19:12
---
Happens on s390 too.
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
-B/home/uweigand/fsf/gcc-head-install/s390-ibm-linux/bin/ -c -g -O2
-gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc-head/gcc/ada
../../gcc-head/gcc/ada/a-elchha.adb -o ada/a-e
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
19:12 ---
Subject: Bug 23139
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 19:12:00
Modified files:
fixincludes: Change
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 19:16
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-15 19:17
---
On 4.1.0 20050914 on s390-linux, two tests have similar failures:
,.,. CXB4005 ACATS 2.5 05-09-14 20:15:52
CXB4005 Check that the functions To_COBOL and To_Ada produce
correct results.
*
--- Additional Comments From jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 19:18
---
Please try GCC 4. We're unlikely to work on tweaking the performance of the GCC
3.4 line.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18192
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-15 19:19
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On 4.1.0 20050914 on s390-linux, two tests have similar failures:
Ooops: 4.0.2 20050913 (prerelease) (since 4.1.0 does not bootstrap because of
PR22533
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
19:28 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-15 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration in class
"jason at redhat dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
| in class
|
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet|i386-redhat-linux and |
|x86_64-redhat-linux |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885
Dom jump-threading iteration can partially or completely unroll a loop. This
prevents analysis of number of iterations and inhibits loop optimizations by
hiding the loop.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00303.html
--
Summary: Dom jump-threading unrolls loops
Product:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
19:44 ---
Confirmed, this seems like a good approach at least to me.
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDe
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
19:48 ---
Really memcpy should only cause permissiveness at the tree level and nothing
else as the memcpy
should always be expanded to a load/store if alignedness does not matter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
20:12 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
file1.c:
int g(void);
int main(void)
{
return g();
}
file2.c:
static int f(int a, int b, int c) __attribute__((noinline));
static int f(int a, int b, int c)
{
return a+
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
20:14 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
20:15 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 20:17
---
Fixed on mainline. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
20:17 ---
Subject: Bug 23288
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 20:17:09
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/java/net:
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-09-15 20:33
---
Does not work for me, checkouts from Sep. 8, and
from today (Sep. 15). Exact same error when running
make check, after make bootstrap.
Debian stable, SMP, autogen 5.6.6-2, autoconf 2.59a-3,
.../configure --
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
20:52 ---
Same on my AMD64/Linux box.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
For 20001226-1.c at -O3, i get:
Execution times (seconds)
tree VRP : 11.32 (10%) usr 0.08 ( 9%) sys 11.68 (10%) wall
3194 kB ( 8%) ggc
tree operand scan : 28.39 (26%) usr 0.17 (18%) sys 29.00 (25%) wall
2722 kB ( 7%) dominance frontiers : 35.35 (32%) usr 0.13
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
21:19 ---
Nathan, do you have any insights about this PR?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23513
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
21:31 ---
Why is this marked as DR 278? I think it's DR 488.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
--- Additional Comments From olly at survex dot com 2005-09-15 21:38
---
Confirmed fixed in:
g++-4.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050301 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0-0pre6ubuntu7)
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 21:39 ---
Sounds like we're in violent agreement, then.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
We are now emitting duplicate dump file numbers:
file.c.t10.cleanup_cfg
file.c.t10.lower
This started happening after Paolo's pass reorg. He agreed to look at this.
--
Summary: Duplicate dump file numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIR
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |200
class OtherClass;
class MyClass
{
public:
const OtherClass* GetOther() const { return ( m_other_p ); }
protected:
OtherClass* GetOther() { return ( m_other_p ); }
OtherClass *m_other_p;
friend class FriendClass;
};
In this case friend classes are allowed to acce
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
