--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
07:33 ---
Subject: Bug 23560
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 07:33:27
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 07:37
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
Pinski-
That last configuration I sent you seems to almost work. Make finally
finished and then I ran "make install". arm-linux-gc
--- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
07:47 ---
do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=HelloWorld -g -o HelloWorld.exe
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23569
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-08-26 07:50
---
The problem here is in the sse_concatv2sf pattern:
;; ??? In theory we can match memory for the MMX alternative, but allowing
;; nonimmediate_operand for operand 2 and *not* allowing memory for the SSE
;; alternat
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-08-26
07:55 ---
Unfortunately the patch causes gcc.c-torture/compile/920928-5.c to fail on
powerpc-linux. Infinite recursion in gimplify_expr.
--
What|Removed |Added
Compiling using
g77 -save-temps -g -W -o opacTesting opacityTesting.f contop_3D.f eos_eqn.f
eos.f lineq.f /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2
produces the following output:
opacityTesting.f: In program `MAIN__':
In file included from opacityTesting.f:0:
opacityTesting.f:470: internal compiler error: in gen_
--- Additional Comments From samreg at astro dot uu dot se 2005-08-26
08:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=9588)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9588&action=view)
file produced by save-temps command
The bug lists a range of source files included in the compilation cal
I tried compilers 4.1.0 through mainline and none of them warn about nitializing
a float variable with a value that will overflow, underflow, or lose precision
for -W or -Wextra.
But in GCC info, It is said like this:
in GCC info(GCC 3.3.4).
`-Wextra'
(This option used to be called `-W'. T
isfy its constraint" message while compiling newlib
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
The above mentioned error occur while:
My system is set up with compiler gcc-4.0.1 build on linux for native linux
On this system I build the binutils and crosscompiler for target m68hc12.
After compiling this gcc-m68hc12 c
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From aw11 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de
2005-08-26 09:13 ---
GCC must error out when clobbering the frame pointer register because it is
likely to generate faulty code when the frame pointer is clobbered. You have to
save and restore the frame pointer on you
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
09:34 ---
I have a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguen
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-08-26 09:35
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Unfortunatelly, ludcompf() result (the second one) is wrong when -O1 or -O2
> is used. It is correct without optimizations.
This is a problem of infamous i387 precision handling. The er
--- Additional Comments From ma1flfs at bath dot ac dot uk 2005-08-26
10:27 ---
Thank you very much for fixing this so quickly!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23546
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
10:48 ---
Have a possible patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
gcc version: 4.0.2 20050825 (prerelease)
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20050825/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc4
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-languages=c,c++
Command line:
gcc -c -march=pentium4 -O3 test.ii
(removing the -O3 flag m
--- Additional Comments From ma1flfs at bath dot ac dot uk 2005-08-26
11:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=9589)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9589&action=view)
Original reduced source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23575
--- Additional Comments From ma1flfs at bath dot ac dot uk 2005-08-26
11:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9590)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9590&action=view)
Preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23575
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
11:47 ---
The opacityTesting.f is required to reproduce this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keyword
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|"insn does not sat
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet||i686-p
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
11:53 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20528 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
11:54 ---
*** Bug 21201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
11:54 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20528 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
11:54 ---
*** Bug 23574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: output_operand:|[4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE:
|unterminated assembly |output_operand: unterminated
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
12:07 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23575
Did work with 4.0.2 20050728, does no longer with 4.0.2 20050825
--
Summary: [4.0 regression] tree check: expected class ÂtypeÂ, have
exceptional (error_mark) in grokdeclarator, at c-
decl.c:4252
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
12:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9591)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9591&action=view)
testcase (unreduced)
Testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23576
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
12:50 ---
Semms to be fixed on todays branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
12:51 ---
Can you show an example?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23572
gcc generates supruious warnings about switches not handling things which it
could (or should) be easily able to deduce are impossible (e.g. assert(v!=FOO)
just before the switch that gets reported for not handling FOO.
Environment:
System: Linux duncan 2.6.11.10 #34 Thu May 26 11:47:48 BST 2005
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
13:02 ---
The warning is done without flow control.
The optmization needs a "full" VRP which keeps of track of discontinuous ranges
which is too expensive
really.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
13:27 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
typedef double __v2df __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
typedef __v2df __m128d;
static __inline __m128d __attribute__((__always_inline__)) _mm_set1_pd (double
__F) {
ret
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
13:30 ---
It is obvious what is wrong from the .md file:
(define_insn "sse2_movsd"
[(set (match_operand:V2DF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=x,x,m,x,x,o")
(vec_merge:V2DF
(match_operand:V2DF 2 "nonimm
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
13:50 ---
Patch posted.
--
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
13:57 ---
Not. Needs a checking enabled compiler to reproduce. That "did work with
4.0.2 20050728" may be bogous therefore, too.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:07 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct ipr_path_entry path[0];
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:09 ---
Oh, and we blame
2005-08-16 James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tree-optimization/21105
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Use TYPE_SIZE_UNIT not TYPE_SIZE in
TREE_OVERFLOW check.
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:14 ---
The reduced testcase also fails on the mainline and in 4.0.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:15 ---
Note this is a latent bug before Jim's patch, it just exposed the non reduced
testcase ICE on the 4.0
branch for some reason.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23576
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:30 ---
For your last testcase,
struct A { int a[1000]; }
A f();
void g(A);
void h() { g(f()); }
all of 3.4 and 4.1 produce exactly two temporaries.
One to dump the result of f(), which get's copied to a new temp
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
14:24 ---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Nathan M wrote:
>> do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=HelloWorld -g -o
>> Hell
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
14:59 ---
: Search converges between 2004-10-25-014001-trunk (#609) and
2004-10-25-161001-trunk
(#610).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23491
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:01 ---
It started to fail after 20041211.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23513
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:02 ---
: Search converges between 2004-10-20-014001-trunk (#600) and
2004-10-20-161001-trunk
(#601).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23440
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:05 ---
I am handling the testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rth at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:13 ---
Subject: Bug 22439
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 15:13:19
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:14 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:14 ---
Subject: Bug 22439
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 15:14:14
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/t
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
15:53 ---
Subject: Bug 23081
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 15:52:54
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23081
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 15:57
---
This got broken by the libcpp/files.c part of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00272.html
My understanding of the change was that this was just a performance improvement.
The question is if that ch
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 16:16
---
Indeed. If I back out:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libcpp/files.c.diff?r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libcpp/files.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
it works just fine.
*** This bug
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 16:16
---
*** Bug 20356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Just an internal reminder: seems really straightforward.
--
Summary: Implement resolution of DR 464 [Ready]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
Assigned
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 14:22
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=HelloWorld -g -o
> HelloWorld.exe
Still reporting an error, althought slightly d
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
16:23 ---
Patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 23506
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 16:26:54
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-common.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||23579
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23478
The patch from rtl-optimization/23478 breaks Ada:
$ gdb --args ../../gnat1 -quiet -dumpbase a-stzmap.adb -O2 -W -Wall -fPIC -g
-gnatpg -gnatO a-stzmap.o a-stzmap.adb -o /tmp/ccH9s7Af.s
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Ge
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 17:07
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> You want --main=MAINCLASS (or in this case HelloWorldApp).
Ok, I fixed that and it seem to cross compile fine without any errors.
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 17:11
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
For reference the exact compile line I gave was:
===code===
/usr/local/bin/arm-linux
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:14 ---
Fixed on the mainline at least.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:17 ---
Subject: Bug 23467
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 17:17:06
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog stor-layout.c
Log message
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.1 regression] rtl- |[4.1 regression] rtl-
|optimization/23478 breaks |optimization/23478 breaks
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:20 ---
Eric Botcazou is sparc maintainer:
sparc port Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sounds like you have a mismatching header installed and nothing more.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:35 ---
Hmm, one more thing the push (the -Os code) while the -O2 code does not so it
seems to me that it
should be faster not to do the push.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23525
:marais; cat enum.c
/* This fails to generate errors on gcc 3.4.4 but works on 3.3.3 and 3.3.6 */
enum {
KERN_KDB = 69,
KERN_KDB = 70
};
:marais;
:marais; /share/soft/gnu/gcc/3.4.4/bin/gcc -v -save-temps enum.c
Reading specs from
/share/soft/gnu/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/
--- Additional Comments From castor at 3pardata dot com 2005-08-26 17:38
---
For comparison, here is output that I expect:
:marais; /share/soft/gnu/gcc/3.3.3/bin/gcc -v -c -save-temps enum.c
Reading specs from
/share/soft/gnu/gcc/3.3.3/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.3/specs
Configure
--- Additional Comments From guillaume dot melquiond at ens-lyon dot fr
2005-08-26 17:38 ---
> all of 3.4 and 4.1 produce exactly two temporaries.
Yet I said that g++ 3.4 did not produce any temporary, and I still think so. No
temporaries, only g's stack frame. See the following assembl
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:40 ---
Fixed already for 3.4.5.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21899 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:40 ---
*** Bug 23580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 17:42
---
Jakub, sorry, having connectivity issues since yesterday. Can you put your most
recent patch and commentary in this bug report? Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22309
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 18:01
---
I've been able to reproducte the same exact issue in arm-linux-gcc-4.0.1 which I
build from source by the following process:
===code
../configure --targ
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 18:19
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
It appears the Segmentation Fault error I get at runtime is common and
already documented as bug# 5487. The bug was closed due to di
--- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-26
18:31 ---
Subject: RE: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
Hi.
You sent me this message:
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 6:3
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
18:37 ---
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-26
> 18:31 ---
> Subject: RE: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-26
> 18:31 ---
> Subject: RE: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
>
> Hi.
>
> You sent me this message:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:35 ---
Subject: Bug 19004
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 19:35:13
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
gcc/testsuite
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:38 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mark at codesourcery dot com|
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:38 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.2.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:38 ---
Subject: Bug 19004
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-bra
After ./configure and then make, we have this:
...
gcc -c -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.././intl ../.././intl/finddomain.c
In file included from /mingw/include/io.h:21,
from /mingw/include/unistd.h:10,
from ../.././intl/finddomain.c:30:
/mingw/include/stdint
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:37 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:38 ---
Subject: Bug 23491
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 19:37:52
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:33 ---
Subject: Bug 23491
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 19:32:31
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog cp-tree.h init.c typeck.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
19:55 ---
This is either a bug in intl or stdin.h. Could you add -g3 and -save-temps and
then attach the
preprocessed source?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23581
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.0.2 4.1.0
Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE|[3.4 Regression] ICE in
|in uses
With "g++ -O2" the following code produces
(0,0)
Segmentation fault
on Itanium only.
I apologise for leaving the includes in, but these are standard and long
includes, so I thought it should
be okay. I am unfortunately unable to test with more recent versions. The
original project was 1,
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
21:11 ---
Subject: Bug 20534
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 21:10:59
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/confi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
21:11 ---
Two things.
First this is a redhat specific version of GCC: Red Hat Linux 3.2.3.
Second 3.2.x is no longer being updated, Can you try 3.4.4?
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
21:18 ---
Subject: Bug 21955
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 21:18:00
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 21:20
---
Fixed in 4.0.2
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVE
The Ada Reference Manual states in D.8 Monotonic Time:
"(32)
A clock jump is the difference between two successive distinct values of the
clock (as observed by calling the Clock function). There shall be no backward
clock jumps."
The "clock" referenced above is the "Clock" function in "Ada.Real_T
--- Additional Comments From rfurmani at uwaterloo dot ca 2005-08-26 21:29
---
Subject: Re: Simple code segfaults on itanium
I know it is not a good version, and we are trying to get the admin to
upgrade it, but until then this is all I have access to. I still
wanted to post it to s
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
21:57 ---
Subject: Bug 23560
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 21:57:28
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog loop.c
Log message:
/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20050826-2.c
Log message:
PR rtl-opt/23560
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20050826-2.c: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5967&r2=1.5968
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
