--- Additional Comments From pomac at vapor dot com 2005-08-01 00:54
---
.ii file available from here, 1.1 mb uncompressed... 19575 lines...
get it here: http://pomac.netswarm.net/misc/GBA.ii.gz
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23168
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:01 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
struct dom
{
static int tostr();
void eval_old() volatile{tostr();}
~dom() throw();
};
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23168
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:29 ---
Subject: Bug 22311
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 01:29:07
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c
gcc/tes
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:34 ---
Subject: Bug 22311
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 01:34:14
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:39 ---
At least on ppc-darwin, the scheduler takes most of the time and most of the
memory usage.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:40 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
01:53 ---
we are trying to allocate 1.5GB on ppc-darwin, this is just wrong This is on
the mainline. I have not
looked where we were allocating it yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23168
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
02:11 ---
#0 xmalloc_failed (size=1859158144) at
/Users/pinskia/src/local3/gcc/libiberty/xmalloc.c:123
#1 0x0042762c in xcalloc (nelem=232394768, elsize=8) at
/Users/pinskia/src/local3/gcc/libiberty/
xmalloc.c:164
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01
02:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg5.html
--
What|Removed |Added
Key
--- Additional Comments From cpence at gmail dot com 2005-08-01 02:24
---
Three months later, any movement on this bug? How is the PCH code in the 4.0
branch? PCH support would be a godsend to people supporting large C++ projects
on GCC.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From geoffk at geoffk dot org 2005-08-01 04:31
---
Subject: Re: Members of anonymous namespaces should be 'static'
On 31/07/2005, at 7:24 PM, cpence at gmail dot com wrote:
> Three months later, any movement on this bug? How is the PCH code
> in the 4.0
> b
In the function bar, the INTENT(IN) markers mean that p and q may not be
modified by bar. This means that the constants 3 and 12 can be progagated
in the function foo. My guess is that there should be some way for alias
analysis to be taught about this, so I've added the experts to the CC: li
forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/320398
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../lib/libmudflapth.so: warning: the
use of `pthread_attr_setstackaddr' is deprecated, use `pthread_attr_setstack'
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../lib/libmudflapth.so: warning: the
use of `pthread
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
