[Bug c/22278] gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile

2005-07-03 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-03 07:09 --- (In reply to comment #35) > Subject: Re: gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile I apologize for interjecting, but wanted to verify my perception the conclusions reached; are they essentially?: - although an object

[Bug c/22278] gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile

2005-07-03 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-07-03 07:27 --- Subject: Re: gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile "schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (In reply to comment #35) | > Subject: Re: gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile | | I apologize

[Bug c/22278] gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile

2005-07-03 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-03 07:54 --- (In reply to comment #39) > Subject: Re: gcc -O2 discards cast to volatile So unfortunately, again the question which comes to mind is what should happen when a program specifies an undefined behavior? Persona

[Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Many C++ testsuite execution tests started failing on mainline between 20050627 and 20050630, on platforms including hppa2.0w-hpux, hppa64-hpux and ia64-hpux. gcc-testresults shows failures also on other platforms such as ia64-linux. Binary searching for "g++.dg/eh/cond1.C execution test" as a te

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||EH, sjlj-eh, wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords|sjlj-eh | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284

[Bug libgcj/22283] Fail to build libjava under zh_TW.UTF-8 locale.

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 11:40 --- IIRC This is a libtool bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283

[Bug tree-optimization/22029] [4.1 Regression] ICE with -fdump-tree-copyprop3-details

2005-07-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 11:46 --- Subject: Bug 22029 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 11:45:59 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-pretty-print.c Log m

[Bug tree-optimization/22135] The gcc-4.1-20050611 compiler ICE's using -ftree-vectorize in conjunction with -fdump-tree-all-details-stats

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 11:52 --- (In reply to comment #4) > P.S.: Why comes .c.t59.copyprop4 before .c.t72.copyprop3 (At that point the > ICE > seems to occur)? I forgot to mention this is due to how tree-optimizate works, it is really a

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-07-03 12:08 --- Strange, I have certainly bootstrapped/regtested the initial -fstack-protector patch on ia64-linux and there were no regressions, neither on HEAD (20050625 tree + those patches) nor in the 4.0.1 backport. g++.dg/eh

[Bug tree-optimization/21568] [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted

2005-07-03 Thread gcc2eran at tromer dot org
--- Additional Comments From gcc2eran at tromer dot org 2005-07-03 12:12 --- To make it easier to evaluate my claim, here are all messages in the thread linked from comment 1 that seemingly contradicy comment 9: Nathan Sidwell: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00085.html Dale Johann

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-03 12:17 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, jakub at redhat dot com wrote: > Strange, I have certainly bootstrapped/regtested the initial -fstack-protector > patch on ia6

[Bug tree-optimization/22279] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

2005-07-03 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 12:51 --- Created an attachment (id=9197) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9197&action=view) preprocessed source on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Here is the preprocessed version of testsuite_abi.cc on x8

[Bug tree-optimization/22279] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

2005-07-03 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 13:20 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566 > Here is the preprocessed version of testsuite_abi.cc on > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Compile with -O2. >

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
++ 4.0 compiled/linked g++.dg/eh/cond1 also works when run against 4.0 libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one, but segfaults when using 20050703 HEAD libstdc++.so (FYI, libgcc_s exact version doesn't matter). cond1.s compiled by 20050703 HEAD and 4.0 is in fact identical except .ident and COMDAT se

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 13:41 --- Testing my patch on ia64 still reveals two new failures: gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c comp

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
l when run against 4.0 libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one > (but in that case built with the -fstack-protector patch in). > Now, g++ 4.0 compiled/linked g++.dg/eh/cond1 also works when run against 4.0 > libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one, but segfaults when using 20050703 HEAD > libstdc++

[Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr

2005-07-03 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:10 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr > > "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | --- Additional Comments From

[Bug tree-optimization/22279] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:46 --- Confirmed, reduced testcase for powerpc64-darwin at least: template struct pair { typedef _T1 first_type; typedef _T2 second_type; _T1 first; _T2 second; pair(const _T1& __a, const _T2& __b) : firs

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:52 --- The extra failures are assembler warnings: Executing on host: /abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/xgcc -B/abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/ /abuild/stevenb/mainline/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c -w -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/22279] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:56 --- And here is a testcase which fails in both 32 and 64bit mode: struct string { long long _M_p; long long i; string(); int begin(); int end(); string(int, int); }; struct symbol { int type; str

[Bug tree-optimization/22029] [4.1 Regression] ICE with -fdump-tree-copyprop3-details

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 15:16 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18279] [4.0/4.1 regression] missing function bodies from -fdump-translation-unit

2005-07-03 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 15:37 --- fixed for 4.1.0 -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/13906] genmodes.c:964: internal compiler error: Bus error in md5_process_block

2005-07-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 15:38 --- Subject: Bug 13906 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 15:38:39 Modified files: include: ChangeLog ansidecl.h md5.h Log mess

[Bug other/13906] genmodes.c:964: internal compiler error: Bus error in md5_process_block

2005-07-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 15:40 --- Subject: Bug 13906 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 15:40:30 Modified files: libiberty : ChangeLog md5.c Log message:

[Bug ada/22285] New: __gnat_is_absolute_path: Segmentation fault

2005-07-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
../../gnatmake -c -I../rts -I. -I/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/ada gnatchop --GCC=". ./../xgcc -B../../ -g -O2 -mdisable-indexing -gnatpg -gnata" raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access make[3]: *** [../../gnatchop] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/obj

[Bug tree-optimization/21568] [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted

2005-07-03 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-03 17:33 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Hey, we should be *happy* that we found a standard-compliance excluse to fix > the > code-breaking regression and make those casts work like everybody wanted! - I couldn't more stron

[Bug middle-end/22253] [4.1 Regression] ICE while compiling libjava/gnu/gcj/xlib/natWindow.cc

2005-07-03 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 18:23 --- Hm, seems to work now :) At least for the build. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00144.html Could one confirm if it works on x86 with the reduced tc? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures

2005-07-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug middle-end/22253] [4.1 Regression] ICE while compiling libjava/gnu/gcj/xlib/natWindow.cc

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 18:27 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hm, seems to work now :) > At least for the build. Try with checking enabled, you will see it still fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22253

[Bug c/22286] New: SSE-intrinsic: __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si - internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083

2005-07-03 Thread shapovalow at gmail dot com
Compliation fails with any optimisation level enabled (-O1, -O2, -O3). Problem instruction: __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si (SSE intrinsic) -- Summary: SSE-intrinsic: __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si - internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083 Product: g

[Bug c/22286] SSE-intrinsic: __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si - internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083

2005-07-03 Thread shapovalow at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From shapovalow at gmail dot com 2005-07-03 23:09 --- Created an attachment (id=9198) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9198&action=view) Preprocessor output to demonstrate internal error in __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si Reading specs from /usr/local

[Bug target/22286] SSE-intrinsic: __builtin_ia32_cvttss2si - internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 23:16 --- Fixed at least in 4.0.x. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/22287] New: [4.1 Regression] New gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-2.c fails

2005-07-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gcc-4.1/objdi r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-2.c -w -O2 -fno-show-column -lm -o /home/dave/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/testsuite/simd-2.x 2(timeout = 300) /home/dave/gcc-4.1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/

[Bug middle-end/22287] [4.1 Regression] New gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-2.c fails

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 23:27 --- Confirmed on both ppc-darwin and i686-pc-linux-gnu. This was introduced between: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-06/msg00121.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-06/msg00089.html so

[Bug testsuite/22288] New: dg-final: couldn't compile regular expression pattern

2005-07-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14341.c scan-tree-dump-times fn_call \(1\) 1 Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gcc-4.1/objdi r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14490-1.c -fdump -tree-gimple -fno-show-column -S -o pr14490-1.s(timeout = 300)

[Bug testsuite/22288] dg-final: couldn't compile regular expression pattern

2005-07-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 23:55 --- Subject: Bug 22288 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 23:55:05 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug testsuite/22288] dg-final: couldn't compile regular expression pattern

2005-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 23:55 --- Stupid "plus". Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/18411] Warning not legitimate

2005-07-03 Thread SebastianR at gmx dot de
--- Additional Comments From SebastianR at gmx dot de 2005-07-04 01:38 --- I think there might be an actual bug with this new warning: In the qsort man page, it says you can use strcmp as the last argument to qsort. So the types must be compatible, and it also works. However, this fails:

[Bug tree-optimization/22279] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

2005-07-03 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-04 02:21 --- The bug you have indentified (which is related but not the same) reduces to: struct string { long long _M_p; long long i; string(); int begin(); int end(); string(int, int); }; struct symbol {

[Bug c/22289] New: problem in gimp downscaling routines when compiling with -mfpmath=sse

2005-07-03 Thread mkrisch at yahoo dot com dot au
i have entered a bug for gimp (#309170) in which gimp would crash when i opened an image of the same resolution as my current screen. in that situation, gimp automatically downscales the image to fit on the screen. when gimp was compiled with -mfpmath=sse the crash would occur. on recompiling wit