[Bug middle-end/22207] Spurious 'might be used uninitialized' warnings in STL headers with -O2

2005-06-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |middle-end GCC host triplet|i686-pc-cygwin | GCC target triplet||i6

[Bug rtl-optimization/22208] [4.0/4.1 Regression] flag_rename_registers is not enabled at -O3 or above

2005-06-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 23:32 --- There are patches missing from 4.0 to fix some cases where regrename could produce wrong code. Besides, enabling passes on a release branch sounds like an awfully bad idea. Setting 4.1 as the target miles

[Bug libfortran/22209] New: [4.1 regression] libgfortran unresolvable symbols on irix6.5

2005-06-27 Thread billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
All gfortran execute tests fail on mips-sgi-irix6.5 on mainline since 2005-06- 23 18:55 UTC. The run time loader rld reports that libgfortran.so has unresolvable symbols __udivti3 __divti3 __umodti3 and __multi3 The error is: 108352656:./PR19754_2.exe: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in /disk4

[Bug fortran/22210] New: gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness

2005-06-27 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
There seems to be something weird going on in gfc_conv_array_initializer. In the EXPR_ARRAY case, the code builds both an "index" and a "range". Then, optionally, it adds both of them to the constructor list being built. This is strange: I would expect either of them to be added, but not both.

[Bug target/22209] [4.1 regression] libgfortran unresolvable symbols on irix6.5

2005-06-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 23:44 --- This is a target bug. It should be implementing the TI mode functions. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness

2005-06-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 23:46 --- This is not the first time I have seen this in both the Ada and gfortran front-ends. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210

[Bug other/21350] [4.0/4.1 Regression] release now requires bision

2005-06-27 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 23:47 --- I don't understand this PR. Here is evidence that c-parse.c is in fact included: $ tar tjf gcc-core-4.0.1-20050616.tar.bz2 | grep c-parse gcc-4.0.1-20050616/gcc/c-parse.in gcc-4.0.1-20050616/gcc/c-parse.y

[Bug tree-optimization/21959] [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances

2005-06-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 00:52 --- Subject: Bug 21959 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 00:52:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-niter.c

[Bug target/21757] 64bit multilib for ppc-darwin

2005-06-27 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Additional Comments From lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2005-06-28 01:08 --- I'd like to point out that as documented extensively in bug report 22082, 64-bit compilation *does* work on powerpc-darwin-8 with gcc-4.0.0, and it doesn't now work on the mainline or the 4.0 branch. Mik

[Bug tree-optimization/21959] [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances

2005-06-27 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 01:14 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/22019] [4.1 Regression] do_structure_copy ICE on Ada gnatlib

2005-06-27 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 22019 depends on bug 21959, which changed state. Bug 21959 Summary: [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21959 What|Old Value |New Valu

[Bug tree-optimization/21994] [4.1 regression] complex throwing functions cause ICE

2005-06-27 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 21994 depends on bug 21959, which changed state. Bug 21959 Summary: [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21959 What|Old Value |New Valu

[Bug tree-optimization/21923] [4.1 Regression] Ada compiler fails to build on gcc 4.1

2005-06-27 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 21923 depends on bug 21959, which changed state. Bug 21959 Summary: [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21959 What|Old Value |New Valu

[Bug tree-optimization/18373] [meta-bug] VRP Value Range Propagation

2005-06-27 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 18373 depends on bug 21959, which changed state. Bug 21959 Summary: [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, drops loop exit test in well-defined wrap-around circumstances http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21959 What|Old Value |New Valu

[Bug fortran/15382] frontend too lenient when checking variable declarations

2005-06-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|Tobias dot Schlueter at |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org |physik dot uni-muenchen dot | |de

[Bug fortran/12366] array assignment fails

2005-06-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 15:38 --- *** Bug 20686 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21562] [4.0 Regression] Quiet bad codegen (unrolling + tail call interaction)

2005-06-27 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-06-28 01:29 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Quiet bad codegen (unrolling + tail call interaction) > > --- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-26 > 01:53 --- > Jan, would you please see if

[Bug libgcj/22211] New: Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-27 Thread greenrd at greenrd dot org
Thread.interrupt does not check if the thread is alive - it just signals the thread regardless. This sometimes causes a segfault followed by an abort, because the native thread library gets passed stale data. Unable to create a reproducable test case - but I would hope it's self-evident that the e

[Bug testsuite/21865] gcc.dg/torture/pr21817-1.c fails on hppa2.0w-hpux

2005-06-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug libstdc++/16251] bogus default constructor for std::basic_iostream

2005-06-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug target/22169] internal compiler error

2005-06-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

<    1   2