--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:44 ---
*** Bug 21499 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2005-05-10 17:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to
crtstuff.c
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:28:57PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Addition
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:48 ---
Confirmed and has been a bug since "3.5.0 20040909".
--
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:48 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Confirmed, reduced testcase:
Forgot to say only -ftrapv -O2 is needed to reproduce the bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:49 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:50 ---
This started to happen after "3.5.0 20040909".
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|200
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 17:51
---
Created an attachment (id=8855)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8855&action=view)
something in auto-host.h is needed to compile crtstuff.c
Here is the auto-host.h file that GCC generates.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-10
17:53 ---
I don't understand.
If it is a problem, how does the standard not require to diagnostic?
At least the Stroustrup book is very clear about this. Anyway...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:54 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||janis at g
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
17:58 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't understand.
>
> If it is a problem, how does the standard not require to diagnostic?
>
> At least the Stroustrup book is very clear about this. Anyway...
No what I mean
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-10
18:02 ---
Ah OK. I was referring to the non-integral case (which apparently does need to
be diagnosed), not the integral case.
Anyway, this is indeed a duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
18:24 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
This should compile but doesn't in g++ 3.4.2 (it works in 3.3):
template
class Base {
protected:
T m_member;
};
template
class Derived : public Base {
public:
Derived(T val) { m_member = val; }
};
test.cpp:11: error: `m_member' undeclared (firs
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 18:32
---
Adding 16612.
This is a higher-priority enhancement request. We need a shared_memory
allocator, a lot of people want it, it would be cool and useful, etc.
The one in 16612 is not going to work. We don't and
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21251
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 18:33
---
In mainline, gcc-4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RES
compile this with -O1 (note testcase reduced from real.c):
---
int foo (int u)
{
u = u - 67108864 - 128;
return u;
}
---
compiler output:
bug
extern const char f[];
const char f[] = "";
char g(void) { return f[0]; }
In 4.0, we put f in .sdata; as of 20050510 we put it in .rodata but are still
emitting a gprel relocation. The problem is that by the time we
assemble_variable
on f, the type of f has been reset to the indetermi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
18:35 ---
No the code is invalid, please read the changes page for 3.4.x.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 18:36
---
Unable to reproduce on FC3/gcc-3.4.3. I'm closing this as WONTFIX, because
NOTABUG has been removed from the options. This looks to be an issue with
user's host os.
-benjamin
--
What|Removed
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard dot earnshaw at arm
||dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
18:38 ---
I almost think this was caused by:
2005-05-09 Richard Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* arm.c (arm_gen_constant): Add new heuristic for generating
constant integers that can be expressed as t
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 19:10
---
This affects 4.0 as well, and it prevents ia64 bootstrap.
--
What|Removed |Added
Sever
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
19:13 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
This patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00689.html
caused
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 3.4.4 20050510 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:|
| in fixup_var_refs_1, at function.c:1876
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21503
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
19:29 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Andreas, do you have time to look further into this? That assertion is
> coming from a failed call to validate_replace_rtx; I wonder if there's
> something wrong with the IA64
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||18081
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21503
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
19:33 ---
This started to fail after "3.5.0 20040909" but before "4.0.0 20050225".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21491
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
20:03 ---
IV-OPTS does nothing to this testcase, it does not even change the trees. This
is just a ra issue.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-10 20:04 ---
FYI, the same thing also happen on Linux/ia32.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21503
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
20:21 ---
Subject: Bug 21170
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-10 20:21:29
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-dom.c
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-10 20:22
---
Just checked in a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
20:32 ---
Shouldn't we know what value j has at this point?
# j_3 = PHI ;
:;
return j_3;
92 - 3?
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21503
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
20:33 ---
Anyways here is a testcase which should not produce a constant after the loop:
int bar (unsigned int);
unsigned int
foo (void)
{
unsigned int i, j;
for (i = 1; i < 30; i++)
{
j = 2 + 3*i;
Running gcc or g++ with the -Wp,dM option on an empty source file generates an
internal compiler error.
$ gcc -Wp,dM foo.c
cc1: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6
$ g++ -Wp,dM foo.c
cc1plus: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6
--
Summary: cc1/cc1plus internal error with the -
--- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru 2005-05-10 20:57
---
Hm...
I bootstrap GCC day ago (2005.05.09) using FreeBSD system compiler at FreeBSD
5.3 withou problems. It installed and work (gcc version 4.1.0 20050509
(experimental))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
21:01 ---
*** Bug 21504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
21:01 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20364 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 12725 depends on bug 19285, which changed state.
Bug 19285 Summary: Interfaces not initialized by static field access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19285
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
21:03 ---
Fix checked in.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2005-05-10 21:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to
crtstuff.c
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:57:12PM -, wanderer at rsu dot ru wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comme
--- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru 2005-05-10 21:10
---
i386
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21481
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-10 21:30 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00923.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21503
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-10 21:32 ---
The patch is incomplete. I posted the rest of Kenner patch on 2004-02-12 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00923.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18081
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-10 21:35 ---
BTW, the gcc-patch mailing list archive web interface for 2004-02 is broken.
You have to download the whole mailbox to see Kenner's patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18081
Host: HP-UX 11.00
Output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0.0 --with-gnu-as --with-
as=/opt/binutils/bin/as --enable-languages=c,c++,objc
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.0.0
output of /opt/binutils/bin/as -v:
GNU
--- Additional Comments From pbriggs at clinitech dot net 2005-05-10 21:45
---
Created an attachment (id=8856)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8856&action=view)
Preprocessed file that produces the error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21505
--- Additional Comments From pbriggs at clinitech dot net 2005-05-10 21:54
---
Created an attachment (id=8857)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8857&action=view)
Preprocessed file that produces the error
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20178
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-10 22:06:55
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog gfortran.h invoke.texi lang
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 22:23
---
Fixed on the mainline. I will commit this to the branch after the obligatory
testing and the necessary changes (unfortunately -fsecond-underscore became the
default on the branch).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:28 ---
Actually, ivopts do not produce any "unresolvable overlapping live ranges".
It does not change life range of j_8 at all, and only replaces the variable
i by more suitable strength reduced version ivtmp.6. N
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:31 ---
Already fixed in 4.0.1.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21173 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:31 ---
*** Bug 21505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:42 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
--
Bug 21503 depends on bug 18081, which changed state.
Bug 18081 Summary: [3.4 regression] Infinite memory allocation on -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18081
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
22:42 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
23:07 ---
Both DOM and copyprop are messing this up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21488
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
23:19 ---
I hear from a person this patch also fixes powerp64-linux-gnu bootstrap too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21481
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-05-10 23:21
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Not copy propagating single-argument PHIs
causes out-of-ssa coalescing failure
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:07:24PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Ad
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
23:27 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Be more specific:
>
> 1- What exactly is being "messed up".
Read Zdenek's comment about renaming them.
> 2- Why is it wrong?
Because now we have "unresolvable overlapping live
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-05-10 23:33
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Not copy propagating single-argument PHIs
causes out-of-ssa coalescing failure
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:27:17PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Ad
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 00:05
---
I can confirm that the patch in comment #3 fixes bootstrap on powerpc64-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21481
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
01:04 ---
No feedback in 3 months.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
01:16 ---
I want to say the change in the inline heuristics caused this so really it was
a latent bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
02:25 ---
Re-opening. A re-organization of the tree optimizers is causing us to
misdiagnose this test case once again. I am going to work on a better warning
implementation that doesn't get confused so easily.
See
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-11 03:04
---
I've got a patch in testing.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From veksler at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-11
03:52 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19699 ***
Shouldn't it be marked as a duplicate of 19583 instead, and 19583 be reopened?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From veksler at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-11
03:53 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19699 ***
Shouldn't it be marked as a duplicate of 19583 instead, and 19583 be reopened?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From smelkov at mph1 dot phys dot spbu dot ru
2005-05-11 05:09 ---
Excuse me. The following is unconditionally offtopic, but
is there a way to use whole base namespace, say something like
template
struct A { ... }
template
struct B : A
{
using A::
seen with CVS 20050508
./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/m68k-linux/bin/ -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/m68k-linux/include -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/m68k-linux/sys-include
-L/home/doko/gcc-snapshot-20050508/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -DIN_GCC-W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmis
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian dot org
Known to fail|
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
05:56 ---
Subject: Bug 21471
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 05:56:20
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
05:57 ---
Subject: Bug 21471
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 05:57:07
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-11 06:17 ---
Is there an attribute to declare a function as 'will never return NULL'?
In this case it is true, the called function dereferences the pointer
to return before returning to the caller.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
101 - 178 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
