--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
02:51 ---
This bug report contains no information about reproducing the problems, or even
any evidence that these are in fact compiler bugs, rather than bugs in the
application code. Closing as INVALID.
If addition
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:00 ---
Retargeted to 4.0.1.
AIX maintainer has indicated that this bug is not particularly critical, and
that the problems are difficult to solve.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-17 03:06
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On 16 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does this clear things up? Do
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:30 ---
Subject: Bug 21025
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:30:17
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:35 ---
Subject: Bug 21025
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:35:27
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/templ
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:37 ---
Subject: Bug 21025
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:37:21
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:37 ---
Subject: Bug 21025
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:37:35
Modified files:
gcc/cp : typeck
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:43 ---
Subject: Bug 21025
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:43:01
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog typeck.c
gcc/tests
The attached code has compiled fine for several years on g++, and compiles on
the Compaq CXX compiler. It recently gives the following:
/usr/local/bin/g++ -c -g -fno-elide-constructors -pedantic-errors -Werror
-ansi -fno-common -fstrict-aliasing -Wall -Wold-style-cast -Wsign-promo
-Wpointer-
--- Additional Comments From mckelvey at maskull dot com 2005-04-17 03:47
---
Created an attachment (id=8664)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8664&action=view)
Example source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21066
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:50 ---
Fixed in 3.4.4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESO
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:51 ---
Joseph has mititgated the problem, and we shan't be doing any further work on
this before 4.0.0. So, I have pushed the target milestone back to 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:53 ---
It looks like we'll end up deciding that the bug here is in failing to issue an
error message on invalid code.
Target milestone pushed back to 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |A
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:54 ---
Subject: Bug 20739
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 03:54:04
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:57 ---
Alexandre, I dropped the ball here. This patch is too much buck for not enough
bang for 4.0.0, but I will review it for 4.0.1.
Target milestone changed to 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:58 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
03:59 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
Mark, did you give up on COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPRs in C++ for 4.0? The
C++ portion of the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR20103
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:00 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/17805] limit operator overload candidates for enum operands
On Apr 2, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:01 ---
Joseph, if I understand correctly, this is now an hppa64-hp-hpux* problem only,
and is not a regression. If that's correct, would you please (a) fill in the
target field, (b) update the summary line to rem
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-17 04:03
---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Mark, did you give up on COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPRs in C++ for 4.0? The
> C++ portion of the patch at
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:10 ---
The TYPE_NO_ACCESS_CHECK_P sets off a red flag for me; that suggests that we're
at some point doing access checks directly on _TYPE nodes rather than _DECL
nodes. If so, that's wrong; only declarations hav
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:31 ---
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-04/msg00152.html
for analysis of the:
sorry: semantics of inline function static data 'const size_t __align' are wrong
(you'll wind up with multiple copies)
war
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:51 ---
Removed target milestone; alpha is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:52 ---
We can get by if there are bugs in -fprofile-generate.
Target milestone changed to 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:53 ---
Postponed until 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
04:57 ---
The remaining failures are all either due to (a) defects in the V3 testsuite, or
(b) defects in V3 itself, or (c) semi-spurious warnings in the C++ front end.
Postponed until GCC 4.0.1.
--
Wha
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
06:19 ---
Subject: Bug 20375
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 06:19:18
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/alpha:
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
06:24 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
On Apr 17, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Mark, did you give up on COMPOUND_LI
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ ICE|[4.0 Regression] C++ ICE in
|in |assign_parm_find_entry_rtl
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:29
---
patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01881.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:31
---
Subject: Re: too liberal operator lookup
Why are you pinging bugzilla, and not the list, wherein a c++
maintainer might see it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
06:37 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: too liberal operator lookup
>
> Why are you pinging bugzilla, and not the list, wherein a c++
> maintainer might see it?
Actually he pinged both.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:39
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20375
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
06:51 ---
Subject: Bug 20693
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-17 06:51:12
Modified files:
libjava: Change
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
