--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11 00:06
---
Not recording parentheses does have correctness implications, see this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00302.html
Upgrading the bug status accordingly. Looks like I have to revive my patch
so
The following example uses a minor modification of avr's avr.c config file to
identify readonly static constant data memory references using MEM_READONLY_P
and then simply emits a load-program-memory "lpm" instruction in lieu of a
load-data-memory "ld" instruction sequence (as a step toward enablin
program fc106
! Submitted by Walt Brainerd, The Fortran Company
! GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.1.0 20050322 (experimental))
! Windows XP
! Output is
! 1 2 3
! 1 1 1
! 1 1 1
! Output should be
! 1 2 3
! 1 1 2
! 1 2 3
real, dimension (3) :: a, b
equivalence (a(2), b)
a = (/ (i, i=1,3) /)
print *,
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11 00:16
---
Yes this is the problem, as evidenced in the tree dumps, and as confirmed by
looking through dependency.c.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
00:38 ---
*** Bug 19387 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Bug 2005
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
00:38 ---
This actually can cause an ICE on some targets see PR 20059 which I am going to
close this as a dup of
because there is a patch there already.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20059 ***
--
--
Bug 20405 depends on bug 19387, which changed state.
Bug 19387 Summary: Fortran compiler tries to print HOST_WIDE_INT with %d format
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19387
What|Old Value |New Value
-
the ebuild, so it downloaded and compiled gcc-4.1-20050410.tar.bz2
(I love Gantoo!)
I tried with the problematic code and it is still the same problem :-(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20932
--- Additional Comments From milan at cmm dot ki dot si 2005-04-11 00:46
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for inclusion into 4.0.
I just tried 4.1-20050410 and the problem is still there. So what was fixed? Or
maybe the patches are not in this snapshot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
00:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for inclusion into 4.0.
>
> I just tried 4.1-20050410 and the problem is still there. So what was fixed?
&
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:38:31PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> This fixes the bootstrap problem for me on powerpc-darwin.
>
Thanks. I will commit as soon as I get a clean bootstrap.
Diego.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
01:50 ---
(From update of attachment 8581)
Wrong PR, I am attaching this right now to PR 20934.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
01:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=8582)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8582&action=view)
Hot/Cold patch
Patch by David which was attached to the wrong bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
On Apr 10, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:38:31PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
This fixes the bootstrap problem for me on powerpc-darwin.
Thanks. I will commit as soon as I get a clean bootstrap.
Could you try the patch in PR 20934 and see if it fixed the
bootstra
--- Additional Comments From milan at cmm dot ki dot si 2005-04-11 01:58
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for inclusion into 4.0.
> >
> > I just tried 4.1-20050410 and the p
/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/./gcc/ -B/opt/gnu
64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0-gnu-ld/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0-gnu-
ld/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem /opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0-gnu-ld/hppa64-hp-h
pux11.11/include -isystem /opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0-gnu-l
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
02:24 ---
I really doubt that this is a libfortran problem but a middle-end one or even a
target one.
It might also just be a bug in HP's ld.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
02:35 ---
Note this does not happen with C front-end, I don't know why yet.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-11 02:41 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ld segmentation fault linking libgfortran.sl.0.0
> I really doubt that this is a libfortran problem but a middle-end one or even
> a target one.
I only said libgfort
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
02:54 ---
Somebody must have moved the fold-const changes that caused this over to the
4.0 branch.
Mark, do you want this fix in 4.0?
It's been in mainline for a while now.
It's incredibly low risk. It only change
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-11 03:00 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ld segmentation fault linking libgfortran.sl.0.0
> > It might also just be a bug in HP's ld.
Oops, I just checked and this failure was with GNU ld. Thus, it
probably
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
03:05 ---
This is actually fold checksum error in that TYPE_CONTAINS_PLACEHOLDER_INTERNAL
can change for
any type. I am testing a patch to fix it but it will take a while.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Apr 10, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for alerting me to this one; it does look relatively
> serious.
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-04-11 03:52
---
This patch fixes bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-11 04:27
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] internal compiler
error: verify_stmts failed.
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
> 02:54 -
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:00 ---
Most likely libiberty (the pex* functions) is being miscompiled.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:03 ---
I almost want to say this was caused by:
2005-04-05 Andrew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lambda-code.c (lambda_loopnest_to_gcc_loopnest): Use update_stmt.
Use immediate use iterator.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19014
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19106
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Last reconfirmed|2005-01-09 1
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:30 ---
Confirmed, looks like someone is forgetting to call fold somewhere:
int4 C.465 = 1 - 1;
int4 C.464 = 2;
--
What|Removed |Added
---
The option -ggdb3 has stopped working recently. The following example does not
compile any more
[/Users/fca] cat junk.c
#include
main () {
float a=0;
printf("%f\n",a);
}
[/Users/fca] /opt/gcc-4_0/bin/gcc -ggdb3 junk.c -o junk.o
junk.c:5: internal compiler error: Bus error
Please
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |debug
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:34 ---
Confirmed, this just started to happen in the last three days too.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:38 ---
This was caused by:
2005-04-09 Caroline Tice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* dwarf2out.c (COLD_TEXT_SECTION_LABEL): New macro.
..
(output_line_info): Get cold section lab
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
06:40 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
