[Bug java/20158] New: gcj fails to compile Apache ant, resulting in "Bus error"

To reproduce: 1. Download apache-ant-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz from http://ant.apache.org/bindownload.cgi and unpack 2. Extract the contents of all jars in the lib directory to a temporary directory, and re-jar into a single jar all.jar 3. Run gcj on the jar: gcj -o ant --main=org.apache.tools.ant.lau

[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:00 --- Subject: Bug 19902 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 09:00:22 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Removed files: gcc

[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:01 --- Tests removed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RES

[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902

[Bug target/20018] [4.0 regression][ia64] unable to find a register to spill in class`PR_REG'

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 GCC target triplet|ia64-suse-linux |ia64

[Bug tree-optimization/17790] [4.0 Regression] Significant compile time increases for sixtrack with tree LICM and IV optimization

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:25 --- Is this patch still 4.0 material? No reviewers have looked at it yet :-/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17790

[Bug tree-optimization/19901] [4.0 Regression] ACATS c85006e ICE block does not dominate

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:30 --- Not sure why, but fixed as of today. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/20159] New: Preprocessing needed when assembling gcc/config/sparc/sol2-ci.asm

The file sol2-ci.asm is assembled to yield crti.o for the sparc-rtems target. However sol2-ci.asm contains C preprocessor conditionals to select an appropriate stack frame size depending on whether or not we're building for the SPARC V9 architecture, but the language is specified as "-x a

[Bug target/20159] Preprocessing needed when assembling gcc/config/sparc/sol2-ci.asm

--- Additional Comments From michaelb at ieee dot org 2005-02-23 09:55 --- Created an attachment (id=8260) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8260&action=view) Suggested patch to fix bug. Here is a patch which does the trick... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug tree-optimization/19952] ICE: tree check: expected class 'declaration', have 'statement' (label_expr) in tree_verify_flow_info, at tree-cfg.c:3709

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:00 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:21 --- That's not possible, the .symver directives must be in the same source as defines the symbols in the first operands of .symver. The following patch works for me in 3.4:

[Bug c++/19004] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:23 --- The problem reappeared today :-( -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19004] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19004

[Bug target/20159] Preprocessing needed when assembling gcc/config/sparc/sol2-ci.asm

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:35 --- Confirmed, a regression introduced with: Wed Sep 9 01:32:01 1998 David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add preliminary native sparcv9 Solaris support. * configure.in: Recognize sparv9-*-

[Bug target/20159] Preprocessing needed when assembling gcc/config/sparc/sol2-ci.asm

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:35 --- Taking care of the patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug libgcj/20160] New: [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

The libgcj testsuite is failing substantially all tests that require linking libgcj.a on arm-elf because of missing symbols. This failure started to occur sometime between 2005/02/13 and 2005/02/16. There are about 5000 lines of error messages for each link command: the total testrun log is about

[Bug libgcj/20160] [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:10 --- Does backing out this patch help? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00402.html (See also: PR 20155) -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/20145] gcc 4.0 new warning: class has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor is not suppressed with -isystem

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-02-23 11:16 --- Created an attachment (id=8261) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8261&action=view) preprocessed source Command line for gcc: /usr/local/gcc40d/bin/g++40d -O2 -g -march=opteron -Wall -DALTIVEC -DUSEA

[Bug regression/19120] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in ten_to_ptwo, at real.c:2007

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:19 --- Four weeks without feedback (see #6 and #7) and works for me. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20100] [4.0 Regression] LIM is pulling out a pure function even though there is something which can modify global memory

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:22 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01387.html -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug tree-optimization/20115] [4.0 Regression] Pure functions are mishandled

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:23 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01387.html -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug tree-optimization/20100] [4.0 Regression] LIM is pulling out a pure function even though there is something which can modify global memory

-- Bug 20100 depends on bug 20115, which changed state. Bug 20115 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Pure functions are mishandled http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20115 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug target/20159] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] sol2-ci.asm not correctly assembled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:54 --- Subject: Bug 20159 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 11:53:55 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/sparc:

[Bug target/20159] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] sol2-ci.asm not correctly assembled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:55 --- Subject: Bug 20159 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 11:55:03 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/20159] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] sol2-ci.asm not correctly assembled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 11:57 --- Subject: Bug 20159 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 11:57:07 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/20159] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] sol2-ci.asm not correctly assembled

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 12:00 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01405.html Thanks for the bug report and the fix! -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/20157] [4.0 Regression] Internal compiler error on invalid code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 12:26 --- Confirmed -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ev

[Bug libfortran/20131] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-23 12:28 --- I'll check later wether this is fixed with the proposed fix for PR 19568 to be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg02295.html Thomas -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/20145] [4.0 Regression] template "class has virtual functions ... " is not suppressed with -isystem

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 12:30 --- Ok, it is only a bug with templates. And here is the shortest testcase: # 1 "t.cc" # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1 "t.cc" # 1 "include/t.h" 1 3 4 template class t { virtual void f(); }; # 2 "t.cc" 2 void f(void) { t

[Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 12:50 --- The patch has been approved in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01232.html Zdenek, are you going to commit it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937

[Bug c/20161] New: ICE with dwarf for incomplete element type argument

First of all the typescript: ## [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wtmp> cat gb.c struct XX; typedef void *(*F) (struct XX []); [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wtmp> CVSgcc gb.c -Wall -g gb.c:3: error: array type has incomplete element type gb.c:3: internal compiler error: in gen

[Bug debug/20161] ICE with dwarf for incomplete element type argument

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |debug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20161

[Bug debug/20161] [4.0 Regression] ICE with dwarf for incomplete element type argument

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 13:04 --- The code is invalid as mentioned before in other bugs. Confirmed, a regression. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/20142] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] implicit assignment operator with multi-dimensional array is broken

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 13:35 --- Confirmed. Btw, the relevant part of the standard is [class.copy]/13. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libffi/14554] libffi: ASM error

-- What|Removed |Added Component|other |libffi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14554

[Bug libffi/16832] Wrong location of "ffitarget.h" in "ffi.h".

-- What|Removed |Added Component|other |libffi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16832

[Bug libffi/20104] gij fails on ppc and not on x86

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 13:56 --- Subject: Bug 20104 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 13:56:01 Modified files: libffi : ChangeLog Added files: libff

[Bug c++/20162] New: new/delete performance versus std::allocator

I do not understand why new/delete is slower than std::allocator. Is there a fundamental reason why it is so ? The benchmark program attached gives the following timing for series of new/delete versus std::allocator allocations/deallocations. new/delete std::allocator g++ 3.3

[Bug c++/20162] new/delete performance versus std::allocator

--- Additional Comments From sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 2005-02-23 14:03 --- Created an attachment (id=8262) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8262&action=view) Benchmark program to compare new/delete to std::allocator -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libffi/20104] gij fails on ppc and not on x86

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:05 --- Subject: Bug 20104 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 14:05:15 Modified files: libffi/src/powerpc: ffi.c libffi : Ch

[Bug libgcj/20104] gij fails on ppc and not on x86

--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:06 --- Try it now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug c++/20162] new/delete performance versus std::allocator

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:11 --- operator new/delete just calls malloc/free which is controled by libc in your case glibc, try with malloc/ free and then report a bug to glibc. std::allocate is a sub allocator really. -- What

[Bug fortran/20163] New: gfortran - error opening direct access file

This is the essence of one the errors that one of my programs is seeing. It is a Double Wammy - first the open of the direct access file fails for no reason - then it get an internal library error. g77 and Absoft are happy with it. [dir:~/tests/gfortran] dir% gfortran -g -o recursive recursive.f [

[Bug libfortran/20156] gfortran - bus error on backspace

-- What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20156

[Bug libfortran/20163] gfortran - error opening direct access file

-- What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20163

[Bug libfortran/20163] gfortran - error opening direct access file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:19 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libfortran/20156] gfortran - bus error on backspace

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:20 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/20164] New: Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

When I compile the source file given below with gcc40 I get strange warnings. I use the snapshot 20050220, but with older snapshots i get the same results. The function is correct but the line number is wrong. By the way: Why is "." replaced by "$" ? g++40 -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-u

[Bug c++/20164] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-02-23 14:23 --- Created an attachment (id=8263) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8263&action=view) preprocesd source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20164

[Bug tree-optimization/20165] New: Pointer does not really escape with write

Take the following fortran code (were we know that write does not make the pointer escape): program main dimension x(10) write(3)n,(x(n),n=1,10) end in the last tree dump we get: _gfortran_transfer_integer (&n, 4); n = 1; :; _gfortran_transfer_real (&x[n + -1], 4);

[Bug c++/20164] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:30 --- >By the way: Why is "." replaced by "$" ? Because that would be PR 14329. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/20164] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:36 --- Hmm, werid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20164

[Bug c++/20164] [4.0 Regression] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:46 --- Testcase: struct temp { temp(){} ~temp(){} temp(const temp&){} }; struct crop { int ox, oy, dx, dy; }; struct Parm { temp filename; crop cp; }; void Foo(Parm x); void Bar1() { Parm p;

[Bug c++/20164] [4.0 Regression] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:50 --- Here is another testcase where the lines lines look wrong and can be shown to be a regression from 3.4.0: struct temp { temp(){} temp(const temp&){} }; struct Parm { temp filename; }; void Foo(Parm

[Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

The fix to PR19333 uncovered a problem in the Debian (only?) shipped pthread.h file which breaks bootstrapping on this platform: ./xgcc -B./ -B/home/rguenth/x86_64/gcc4.0-230205/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /home/rguenth/x86_64/gcc4.0-230205/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /hom

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:01 --- It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was introduced at all. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/20167] New: static inlines discared while needed by alias

typescript of the problem: ## [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wtmp> cat gb2.c static inline int foo () { return 123; } static inline int bar () __attribute__ ((alias ("foo"))); int main () { return bar (); } [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wtmp> CVSgcc gb2.c /tmp/ccWI

[Bug java/18362] internal compiler error: in size_binop, at fold-const.c:1598

--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:07 --- Created an attachment (id=8264) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8264&action=view) patch Try this patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362

[Bug java/18362] internal compiler error: in size_binop, at fold-const.c:1598

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362

[Bug c/20167] static inlines discared while needed by alias

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:11 --- This is not a bug. This is a dup of bug 15700. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15700 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/15700] [4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Inlining problem leads to miscompilation of glibc

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:11 --- *** Bug 20167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19716] Segfault with -ftree-vectorize

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-02-23 15:17 --- I have reported a similar problem bug20122 which may be caused by the same bug. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20168] New: [4.0 regression] const function calls treated as pure by LIM 20100 fix

Before the fix for PR 20100 and PR 20115, const and pure calls were both treated as "const". After the fix, both are treated as "pure" by that fix, but a .GLOBAL_VAR is unnecessarily created because of the bambam call in: extern int constfun (void) __attribute__ ((__const__)); extern void bambam

[Bug java/18362] internal compiler error: in size_binop, at fold-const.c:1598

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/20168] [4.0 regression] const function calls treated as pure by LIM 20100 fix

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/20169] New: Serialization: readResolve does not work

] true GIJ: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/gcc/lib /tmp/gcc/bin/gij Enum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] false GCJ: /tmp/gcc/bin/gcj --main=Enum *.class LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/gcc/lib ./a.out [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] false /tmp/gcc/bin/gcj --version gcj (GCC) 4.0.0 20050223 (experimental

[Bug libgcj/20169] Serialization: readResolve does not work

-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20169

[Bug java/20116] gcj-dbtool merging seems to lose mappings

--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:32 --- Please put the jars and .so files somewhere I can see them. -- What|Removed |Added Assi

[Bug tree-optimization/20168] [4.0 regression] const function calls treated as pure by LIM 20100 fix

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, missed-optimization Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug debug/20161] [4.0 Regression] ICE with dwarf for incomplete element type argument

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/20168] const function causes the creation of GLOBAL_VAR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:43 --- Changing this for Diego. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/20168] const function causes the creation of GLOBAL_VAR

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:45 --- It deserves mentioning (for the audience) that the right thing happens for the generated code in the test-case; this problem is mainly an internal wart (IIUC): ... now, the problem is that if there is a mix of r

[Bug java/20056] [4.0 regression] 'verification failed: incompatible type on stack' with --indirect-dispatch

--- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-02-23 16:06 --- I verified the bytecode testcase now passes. Thanks for the fix! (is it final now?) -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/20170] New: Link errors building ACE 5.4.2: undefined reference to `__cxa_get_exception_ptr'

When I use the actual snapshot of gcc40 to compile ACE 5.4.2 I get link errors. I don't how to proceed in this case, the link error occurs after ~350 are compiled and several libraries are generated. This is a new regression, snapshot 20050213 has no problems. My gcc is snapshot 20050220 with pat

[Bug c++/20171] New: Link errors building ACE 5.4.2: undefined reference to `__cxa_get_exception_ptr'

When I use the actual snapshot of gcc40 to compile ACE 5.4.2 I get link errors. I don't how to proceed in this case, the link error occurs after ~350 are compiled and several libraries are generated. This is a new regression, snapshot 20050213 has no problems. My gcc is snapshot 20050220 with pat

[Bug c++/20171] Link errors building ACE 5.4.2: undefined reference to `__cxa_get_exception_ptr'

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-02-23 16:28 --- was entered twice -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/20172] New: member function template declaration not instantiated during the instantiation of the enclosing class template

gcc accepts the following ill-formed code (tested with gcc3.4.2 (mingw) and various cygwin versions (from 3.3.1 to 3.4.3 and an experimental snapshot 4.0.0-20050130) ): template struct foo{ template static void bar() { } }; template foo tester(T) { return foo(); } int main(){ tester(1.2

[Bug java/20116] gcj-dbtool merging seems to lose mappings

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-02-23 16:38 --- After further investigation, I have determined that this is not a bug with the dbtool. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/20172] member function template declaration not instantiated during the instantiation of the enclosing class template

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20172

[Bug c++/20170] Link errors building ACE 5.4.2: undefined reference to `__cxa_get_exception_ptr'

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-02-23 16:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8265) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8265&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20170

[Bug java/18362] internal compiler error: in size_binop, at fold-const.c:1598

--- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-02-23 17:10 --- Patch works for me on the small testcase (N.jar). I'll try on the whole jar when I get the chance. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362

[Bug c/20167] document that attribute alias does not reference a name

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-23 17:11 --- We could document that in the manual though. Reopening to keep track of this as a request for enhancement in the manual. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen

attaching testcase. result should be '1', but is '2', an int is matched to a pointer. (and the pointer has the value of the integer in the function) is known to fail for 3.3.5 and 3.4.4. I can't test with 4.0 atm but I think it also fails because I came across this by a strange internal tree gene

[Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen

--- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2005-02-23 17:16 --- Created an attachment (id=8266) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8266&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173

[Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen

--- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2005-02-23 17:19 --- Comeau C++ thinks this code is invalid. If it's right, this bug might be related to #20157 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173

[Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen

-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #8266|text/x-c++src |text/plain mime type|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173

[Bug libgcj/16923] -D* Options passed to JNI_CreateJavaVM are ignored

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 17:36 --- Subject: Bug 16923 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 17:36:26 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog gcj.texi libjava

[Bug libgcj/16923] -D* Options passed to JNI_CreateJavaVM are ignored

--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-02-23 17:38 --- Fixed on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLV

[Bug java/18362] internal compiler error: in size_binop, at fold-const.c:1598

--- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-02-23 17:40 --- I tried the patched gcj on the whole jar (containing the Nice compiler), and this error does not occur (nor any other, yay!). As far as I can tell, Andrew's patch fixes this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug c++/20174] New: rejects valid partial template function specialization

...and I have another one, this is gcc bug finding day. it's again related to partial template function specializations, but I open a new report because this time it is rejects-valid: (at least I think so) template struct A{ template void function(){} }; template<> template void A::function()

[Bug c++/20175] New: Warnings are issued when initializing struct members with "strings"

When compiling the attached file foo.C using the flag -Wmissing-braces (part of -Wall) then the warning foo.C:3: warning: missing braces around initializer is printed even though no braces are needed around the char array. -- Summary: Warnings are issued when initializing struct memb

[Bug c++/20175] Warnings are issued when initializing struct members with "strings"

--- Additional Comments From gcc at magfr dot user dot lysator dot liu dot se 2005-02-23 18:15 --- Created an attachment (id=8267) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8267&action=view) Program demonstrating the bug Compile with g++ -Wmissing-braces -c foo.C to demonstr

[Bug target/20018] [4.0 regression][ia64] unable to find a register to spill in class`PR_REG'

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:21 --- Subject: Bug 20018 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 18:20:53 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog simplify-rtx.c Log messag

[Bug rtl-optimization/20097] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:21 --- Subject: Bug 20097 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 18:20:53 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog simplify-rtx.c Log messag

[Bug c/20176] New: Received gcc: Internal error on 2 files when compiling postgres from source, only failed on first compilation attempt and was unable to get preprocessed files

Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-slackware-linux/3.3.4/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.3.4/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking --with-gnu-ld --verbose --target=i486-slackware-linux --host=i486-slackware-linux Thread model:

[Bug c++/20175] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Warnings are issued when initializing struct members with "strings"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:27 --- Confirmed, this was introduced (most likely when the patch to fix for PR 19755 was committed). Reduced testcase: struct c { char s[8]; int i;}; struct c a = {"hello", 1}; -- What|Removed

[Bug c/20176] Received gcc: Internal error on 2 files when compiling postgres from source, only failed on first compilation attempt and was unable to get preprocessed files

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:29 --- Not a gcc bug. Tou have bad memory or hardware as it works the second time. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/20174] rejects valid partial template function specialization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:36 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14494 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/14494] Rejected valid specialization of member template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:36 --- *** Bug 20174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20018] [4.0 regression][ia64] unable to find a register to spill in class`PR_REG'

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 18:39 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

  1   2   >