[Bug target/19492] can not build crosscompiler for solaris2.8 (when building libstdc++ - error wcslen...:Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 19:40 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This config.log: > > ./i686-pc-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/config.log > > Andrew, there is no such file, look at comment #2 I copied and pasted from comm

[Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 21:21 --- Yes, it's certainly possible. But indeed pr19511 shows that you can't even get that far with --with-arch=pentium3 at the moment, due to changes that post-date this report. After I get a fix for that problem, w

[Bug target/19293] avr-gcc crashes when using shifts with negative shift count

--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2005-01-19 21:25 --- Hi, here is the changed patch for avr.c . I hope that it is now compliant to the gcc coding standards. I however did not understand what you have meant with "this hunk adds spurious whitespace".

[Bug target/19529] [4.0 regression] sh-rtems multilibs broken

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 21:25 --- Subject: Bug 19529 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 21:25:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog config.gcc Added files:

[Bug target/19529] [4.0 regression] sh-rtems multilibs broken

--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 21:31 --- Patch commited. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESO

[Bug libfortran/19451] Read after a write with a read only file

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-19 21:35 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed, changing the summary a little more. > > Also if the file contained anything, we seg fault when finishing the write (which seems wrong). Here's a test case for that

[Bug libfortran/19451] Read after a write with a read only file

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-19 22:17 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01266.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19451

[Bug java/19295] [4.0 regression] Incorrect bytecode produced for bitwise AND

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:37 --- I'm working on this. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |

[Bug java/19295] [4.0 regression] Incorrect bytecode produced for bitwise AND

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-19 22:44 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Incorrect bytecode produced for bitwise AND steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 > 19:24 --- >

[Bug objc/18862] [4.0 Regression] ICE on gcc-4.0-20041205/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/selector-1.m

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:46 --- Objective-C is not part of the release criteria; removing target milestone. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug objc/19324] [3.4/4.0 Regression] weird message for interface way in implementation

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:46 --- Objective-C is not part of the release criteria; removing target milestone. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug objc/18408] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling code that involves casting classes

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:46 --- Objective-C is not part of the release criteria; removing target milestone. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug objc/18408] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling code that involves casting classes

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:49 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Objective-C is not part of the release criteria; removing target milestone. I should note that this PR blocks building GNUstep with 4.0.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] ivopts causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 22:50 --- Subject: Bug 19038 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 22:50:06 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c Lo

[Bug c++/19448] Different value representation for bitfield width exceeding its type size.

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:08 --- Mark closed this based on early comments discussing invalid code, but later comments discuss a problem with valid code. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/19468] gcc+binutils combined fails bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:11 --- Reopened as it's not a duplicate... (wait for it) -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOL

[Bug bootstrap/19468] gcc+binutils combined fails bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:12 --- ...and closed as invalid, as this is a binutils bug. See comment #2. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:25 --- Now it is back to out of ssa causing one extra BB. -- What|Removed |Added Summary

[Bug target/19492] can not build crosscompiler for solaris2.8 (when building libstdc++ - error wcslen...:Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES)

--- Additional Comments From andreev at comm dot mot dot com 2005-01-19 23:27 --- Created an attachment (id=7998) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7998&action=view) libstdc++-v3/config.log Andrew, here is the config.log. It has errors about _dlopen(close, etc), but i'

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:33 --- (In reply to comment #42) > Now it is back to out of ssa causing one extra BB. I will try get a smaller testcase for this problem now. Thanks Zdenek for fixing the IV-OPTs related problem. -- http://g

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] missing transformations lead to poorly optimized code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:38 --- We now get: L33: lfd f13,0(r11) add r11,r11,r8 lfd f0,0(r10) addi r10,r10,8 fmadd f0,f13,f0,f12 fmr f12,f0 bdnz L33 Which is much better, thanks Zdene

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 00:31 --- (In reply to comment #43) > (In reply to comment #42) > > Now it is back to out of ssa causing one extra BB. > I will try get a smaller testcase for this problem now. Thanks Zdenek for > fixing the IV-OPTs

[Bug libstdc++/19495] basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer to _Rep

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-20 00:34 --- Hi Gaby, > Yes. Basically, we need to have tha aligned attribute work correctly. Agreed, in principle: indeed, we are filing together and taking care of many PRs in this area. > | is not present in the original

[Bug target/18404] unnecessary sll when -mint64 (MIPS)

--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2005-01-20 00:37 --- The discussion was held offline between Richard Sandiford and I. Having a -mint64 option changes the abi for anything that is built with that option and in no abi defined for mips is int defined to 64. You may

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 00:46 --- Here is another reduced testcase: subroutine thin6d(max) parameter(maxindex=64) common array1(maxindex) save do 20 j=1,max array1(j)=1.0 20 continue return

[Bug target/19427] [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-1.c compilation fails for i686 with -msse

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 01:02 --- Testing a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at g

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 01:15 --- (In reply to comment #45) >From -details .optimized file: > Coalesce list: (0)ivtmp.3_12 & (1)ivtmp.3_20 [map: 0, 1] : Fail due to > conflict Huh, how do they conflict, I don't see how. Hmm, I assume that

[Bug tree-optimization/17884] asm 'volatile' is not honored as documented

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 01:33 --- In reply to comment #20: Again, this is not scheduling, per se. This is register rematerialization. We have a value at some point, and we decide that it's cheaper to move the computation rather than store and

[Bug libstdc++/19510] [4.0 regression] Warning using list iterators

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 01:47 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01280.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/19538] New: Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier

Consider the following code sample: struct A { }; typedef struct A A; struct A a; // [1] struct wrapper { struct B { }; typedef struct B B; struct B b; // [2] }; Mainline gives an error for line [2], but not for line [1]. My reading of the standard i

[Bug c++/19538] Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 01:56 --- Confirmed. [2] was PR 11036 by the way. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/19299] [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-01-20 02:09 --- For the log, this is blocking Boost (test: python/bienstman1). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19299

[Bug libstdc++/19535] Wrong return types for __pair_get<1>

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 02:14 --- Subject: Bug 19535 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 02:13:50 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug libstdc++/19535] Wrong return types for __pair_get<1>

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-20 02:16 --- Fixed, thanks Pétur. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVE

[Bug rtl-optimization/5739] "const" and "pure" function attributes pessimize code

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Last reconfirmed|2004-08-26 00:38:25 |2005-01-20 02:17:01 date|

[Bug c++/19299] [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 02:17 --- Works for me. What's the problem? $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -O2 -c pr19299.C --version xgcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050117 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the sou

[Bug c++/19299] [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers

mit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. GNU C++ version 4.0.0 20050119 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19299

[Bug target/19530] MMX load intrinsic produces SSE superflus instructions (movlps)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19530

Re: [Bug c++/19299] [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -O2 -c pr19299.C --version xgcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050117 (experimental) --version makes the compiler to do nothing except for printing out the version. I know. I collapsed both outputs for brevity. Never mind. I was using a --disabled-check

[Bug c++/19299] [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-01-20 02:32 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE with volatile non-PODs pointers pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >>$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -O2 -c pr19299.C --version >>xgcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050117 (experimental) >> > > >

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18617

[Bug c++/19208] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Spurious error about variably modified type

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-01-20 03:08 --- Testing a patch -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |giovan

[Bug ada/19539] New: missing operand: 90.0 * -Sin(A)

As the repro included shows: A := 90.0; B := 30.0 * -Sin(A); fails with a missing operand compile-time error, but: A := 90.0; B := -Sin(A); B := 30 * B; works. with Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions; use Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions; procedure X is A : float; B :

[Bug fortran/19294] intrinsic_transpose.f90 runtime crash

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 03:35 --- Created an attachment (id=7999) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7999&action=view) Make transpose_c[48] functions -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/19518] [alpha] unrecognizable insn (set (reg:V4HI) (const_vector:V4HI)) with builtins

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 03:59 --- Subject: Bug 19518 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 03:59:01 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/alpha:

[Bug rtl-optimization/18427] [meta-bug] We need a better register allocator

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:01 --- I should note that I added the keyword ra but that is because even after this meta-bug goes away (when we get a better register allocator) we can still still track problems which are caused by the registe

[Bug libstdc++/19495] basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer to _Rep

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-01-20 04:08 --- Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer to _Rep "pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is way I'm proposing, *for 4.0, only for 4.0*, to

[Bug target/19518] [alpha] unrecognizable insn (set (reg:V4HI) (const_vector:V4HI)) with builtins

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:13 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/19518] [alpha] unrecognizable insn (set (reg:V4HI) (const_vector:V4HI)) with builtins

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19518

[Bug c/17913] [4.0 Regression] ICE jumping into statement expression

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:15 --- Note with --disable-checking I still get an ICE but this time a seg fault. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17913

[Bug middle-end/19304] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for spec test from emit_move_change_mode

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:18 --- Subject: Bug 19304 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 04:18:08 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog expr.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/19304] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for spec test from emit_move_change_mode

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:22 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19508] [4.0 regression] dwarf2, ICE on __attribute__(aligned) in class template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:25 --- We get <<< Unknown tree: template_type_parm >>> in is_base_type, that seems wrong -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19508

[Bug target/18956] [hppa] 'bus error' at runtime while passing a special struct to a C++ member function

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:25 --- I can reproduce this 3.3.3 and 3.4.3. However, 4.0.0 doesn't have the problem. While this problem may be target specific (ie., a big endian target with downward padding for structures), I don't believe thi

[Bug target/18956] [hppa] 'bus error' at runtime while passing a special struct to a C++ member function

-- What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug c++/19508] [4.0 regression] dwarf2, ICE on __attribute__(aligned) in class template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:36 --- Hmm, after applying the attributes we get: nonlocal VOID file t.cc line 4 align 1 context > attributes result > > Notice how we have a copy in TREE_TYPE, the orginal which we would have don

[Bug fortran/19294] intrinsic_transpose.f90 runtime crash

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 04:37 --- Newest patch posted here: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19294

[Bug target/19293] avr-gcc crashes when using shifts with negative shift count

--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2005-01-20 05:46 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Hi, > > here is the changed patch for avr.c . I hope that it is now compliant to the > gcc coding standards. I however did not understand what you have meant with > "this hunk add

[Bug c++/18098] zero covariant return pointer adjustment results in segfault

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:14 --- We can easy see the problem on the mainline by looking at the tree dumps: [pr18098.cc : 31] D.1709 = [pr18098.cc : 31] top (this); [pr18098.cc : 31] D.1707 = D.1709; [pr18098.cc : 31] D.1710 = D.1707;

[Bug ada/19539] missing operand: B * -A

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:25 --- Hmm, is *- special operand in Ada or is this just a parse error in the front-end (I don't know Ada that at all, well I know enough to be able to read it a little). But you can reproduce it with the followi

[Bug c++/19476] Missed null checking elimination with new

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:29 --- Diego raised some questions about this around the same time I filed it so confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/19427] [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-1.c compilation fails for i686 with -msse

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:35 --- Subject: Bug 19427 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 06:35:38 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i

[Bug target/19427] [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-1.c compilation fails for i686 with -msse

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:37 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/19511] [4.0 Regression] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:47 --- Subject: Bug 19511 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 06:47:38 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i

[Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226

-- Bug 19174 depends on bug 19511, which changed state. Bug 19511 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19511 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug target/19511] [4.0 Regression] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 06:58 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

<    1   2