[Bug c++/19208] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Spurious error about variably modified type

--- Additional Comments From ssolie at telus dot net 2005-01-15 23:10 --- Please add 3.4.2 to known to fail list. 7.Code:test> g++ -c bound_member.cpp bound_member.cpp: In instantiation of `bound_member_action': bound_member.cpp:10: instantiated from here bound_member.cpp:8: error: `c

[Bug c/19465] New: Compiling multiple source files at a time gives redefinition errors

Executing: # gcc -c file1.c file2.c -o file.o gives the following errors: In file included from file2.c:1: C:/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/../../../../include/stdio.h:216: error: re definition of 'vsnprintf' C:/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/../../../../include/stdio.h:216: error: re de

[Bug target/18118] bad code gen for -mcpu=G5 and unsigned long long to double

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|apple-ppc-darwin|powerpc-apple-darwin GCC host triplet|apple-ppc-darwin|powerpc-apple-darwin GCC target triplet|a

[Bug target/18118] bad code gen for -mcpu=G5 and unsigned long long to double

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 00:44 --- The testcase works on Mac OS X 10.3.7 for me with -mcpu=G5 and all levels of optimization. It does not work with -ffast-math, but that is expected. The original bug report does not state what options are used

[Bug c/19465] [IMA] Compiling multiple source files at a time gives redefinition errors

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|Compiling multiple source |[IMA] Compiling multiple |file

[Bug c/19465] [IMA] Compiling multiple source files at a time gives redefinition errors

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 01:15 --- This could either be a newlib bug in their headers or a bug in GCC. Could you attach the preprocessed source for file1.c and file2.c? (This also might be fixed on the mainline by a patch by me but since I d

[Bug libgcj/6996] gij needs assertion-related command-line options

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Last reconfirmed|2004-10-17 0

[Bug c++/17122] Unable to compile friend operator within template

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|2004-08-20 15:20:16 |2005-01-16 01:26:56 date|

[Bug c++/9230] Friend functions defined within template class definitions are injected into the namespace scope at template instantiation time even if there is no declaration.

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|2004-04-26 19:40:07 |2005-01-16 01:27:55 date|

[Bug middle-end/19466] New: [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal

Just a place holder for referencing all of the missed-optimizations with bit-fields. -- Summary: [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, meta-bug Severity

[Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||336, 15826 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19466

[Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 01:36 --- CCing kazu because he opened most of the bugs. Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P1 |P3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18

[Bug rtl-optimization/7061] Alpha: Access of bytes in struct parameters

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2004-11-06 17:36:15 |2005-01-16 01:40:54 date|

[Bug c++/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 01:54 --- I cannot decide if I should put this in C++ or debug component based on: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00871.html But if it was broken by the patch referenced in that email then the testresul

[Bug rtl-optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Floating point computation far slower in 3.2 than in 2.95

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-16 03:35 --- If we're going to mark this as a regression, can somebody pin down the cases where mainline gcc is slower than gcc 2.95? On my system it is about 35% faster. But that is on a Pentium 4. I know that Roger Sayle did so

[Bug rtl-optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 04:50 --- (In reply to comment #39) > Here is the current results for 3.3.2 vs the mainline: > -O0 -O1 -O2 -O3 > 3.3.2 28.93 42.81 61.1358.140 > mainline 11.

[Bug fortran/19467] New: ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write

program test_ch_nml character(len=2):: ch(2)=(/"aa","bb"/) namelist /a/ ch write(*,nml=a) !!This is the offending statement end program test_ch_nml $ d:/irun/bin/gfortran test_ch_nml.f90 test_ch_nml.f90: In function 'MAIN__': test_ch_nml.f90:4: internal compiler error: in gfc_c

[Bug fortran/19467] ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19276 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19467

[Bug fortran/19467] ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 06:46 --- Confirmed. gcc_assert (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (se->expr))); -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly

--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-01-16 07:16 --- Subject: Re: usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly Wonder if this PR could still be considered a missed optimization, as the present logic which determines if an / or % expression's operands may b

<    1   2