[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 01:34 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19143] New: [4.0 regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

2004-12-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE on mainline: == template struct A; template<> struct A {}; == bug.cc:2: error: missing '>' to terminate the template argument list bug.cc:2: error: template a

[Bug target/19142] [4.0 Regression] ppc-darwin no longer builds

2004-12-23 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net |dot org |dot au Status|NEW

[Bug target/19142] [4.0 Regression] ppc-darwin no longer builds

2004-12-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 01:51 --- Subject: Bug 19142 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-24 01:51:05 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug c++/19144] New: SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
We built qt-3.3.2 and kde-3.3.2 using gcc-3.4.3. We did the same on HP-UX 11.x, Redhat Linux, and Redhat Enterprise Linux. http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=110384477320197&w=2 On Solaris/SPARC, we're seeing a problem. None of the other platforms have a problem. I was able to work around

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:54 --- The patch below, somewhat similar to the patch in the original message with the workaround, does *not* work. The only difference between the two is where "int i;" is placed. --- kio/kio/kurlcompleti

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:55 --- Created an attachment (id=7815) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7815&action=view) .ii file using the original workaround patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:56 --- Created an attachment (id=7816) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7816&action=view) .s file using the original workaround patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1

[Bug c++/19144] SPARC backend bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #7815|text/plain |application/octet-stream mime type|| Attachment #7815 is|1

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 01:57 --- This might not be a sparc back-end bug but a bug in the KDE, they might be overflowing the stack or something else. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:58 --- Created an attachment (id=7817) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7817&action=view) .ii file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:59 --- Created an attachment (id=7818) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7818&action=view) .s file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:03 --- Ok, I ran diff on both .s files (id #7816 v id #7818) and found the following: @@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ cmp %g1, 0 bne .LL9 nop - add %fp, -80, %g1 -

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:04 --- Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:08 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug. Not really, it just showed where the problem is. Can you try the mainline as there has been a couple of sparc bugs which have been f

[Bug target/19142] [4.0 Regression] ppc-darwin no longer builds

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:14 --- I can confirm that the patch applied fixes the problem. -- What|Removed |Added S

[Bug c++/19143] [4.0 regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:16 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/14179] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

2004-12-23 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-24 02:23 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers steven at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giovanni, any news? I have a patch around for a l

[Bug tree-optimization/18648] gcc does not remove empty loops

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17640 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:26 --- *** Bug 18648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:59 --- I looked at the .s files more closely and comment #7 might be off. Offsets seem to differ by either 4 or 8 not only 8 like I originally thought. I generated the .s files on HP-UX and it had the same

[Bug driver/19145] New: "gcc --print-multi-lib" doesn't work with config-ml.in

2004-12-23 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
"gcc --print-multi-lib" doesn't work with multilib which is used by config-ml.in in the top level directory. "gcc --print-multi-os-directory" seems to work for config-ml.in. But it isn't available with the older gcc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] hjl]$ gcc "--print-multi-os-directory" ../lib64 [EMAIL PROTECTE

[Bug driver/19145] "gcc --print-multi-lib" doesn't work with config-ml.in

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 03:09 --- Well then this is your bug, you should not be using config-ml.in from the toplevel for build and/or host building. Also there is no way to fix older versions of gcc. -- What|Removed

[Bug driver/19145] "gcc --print-multi-lib" doesn't work with config-ml.in

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 03:17 --- Invalid, config-ml.in should only be used with the new version of gcc and nothing else. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libfortran/18778] ENDFILE is not functionnal

2004-12-23 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 03:36 --- patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-12/msg00228.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18778

[Bug bootstrap/19146] New: Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `intl.h', needed by `c-parse.o'.

2004-12-23 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
The configure and build commands were: /bin/rm -rf *; ../configure --prefix=/export/users/lucier/local/gcc-mainline; make -j 6 bootstrap >& build.log && (make -j 8 -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-m64,}'">& check.log ; make mail-report-with-warnings.log; ./mail-report-with-warnings.log

[Bug bootstrap/19146] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `intl.h', needed by `c-parse.o'.

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 03:41 --- intl.h is not even generated file. What make are you using? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/19146] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `intl.h', needed by `c-parse.o'.

2004-12-23 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Additional Comments From lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2004-12-24 03:55 --- Subject: Re: Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `intl.h', needed by `c-parse.o'. zorn-32% make -v GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Perhaps it's a proble

[Bug other/19082] [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memory allocating 151568 bytes after a total of 4161651196 bytes

2004-12-23 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-24 04:24 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memor > If running stage1 genattrtab compiled without optimization requires more > memory, > then it requires more memory. The value reported

[Bug other/19082] [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memory allocating 151568 bytes after a total of 4161651196 bytes

2004-12-23 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-24 05:00 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memor > If running stage1 genattrtab compiled without optimization requires more > memory, > then it requires more memory. The value reported

[Bug tree-optimization/14638] [4.0 Regression] Variables disappear from debug info at -O1

2004-12-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 05:23 --- Subject: Bug 14638 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-24 05:23:11 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog dwarf2out.c tree-outof-ssa.

[Bug tree-optimization/14638] [4.0 Regression] Variables disappear from debug info at -O1

2004-12-23 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 05:23 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/19136] Can't build gcc 3.4.3: ld parse error on libgcc.map

2004-12-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 06:14 --- You should browse the database before filing a new bug report. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11003 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/11003] libgcc.map: file format not recognized

2004-12-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 06:14 --- *** Bug 19136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/19147] New: invalid rlwinm patterns

2004-12-23 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
andsi3_internal7 and andsi3_internal8 generate invalid LT and GT condition codes. This is because these bits of the condition register are set from all 64 bits of the register in 64-bit mode. I don't believe it is possible to have all of EQ, LT and GT correct using only two rlwinm instructions in

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 06:36 --- This PR is a bit confusing. Please attach the original preprocessed file and post the modification to the original *.s file that appears to fix the bug. -- What|Removed

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:00 --- Created an attachment (id=7820) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7820&action=view) Original pre-processed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:00 --- Created an attachment (id=7821) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7821&action=view) Original pre-processed .s file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7822) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7822&action=view) Pre-processed source with fix (add "int i;") Note: If the 'int i;' is placed after the 'struct d

[Bug target/19144] miscompilation KDE 3.3.2

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 07:07 --- Created an attachment (id=7823) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7823&action=view) Pre-processed .s of kurlcompletion.ii with fix ("int i;" added) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c++/14179] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

2004-12-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 07:07 --- Everyone is in a hurry, this is a regression ;-) Can you attach the patch so someone can have a look and maybe finish it for you? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179

<    1   2