[Bug libstdc++/18837] testsuite_performance.h:63: error: redefinition of 'struct mallinfo'

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-05 23:31 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Res

[Bug rtl-optimization/17728] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083, unrecognizable insn

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 23:42 --- asimage.c:1489: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 82 81 84 6 (set (mem:SI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg/v:SI 97 [ i ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) (reg/v/f:SI 95 [ dst ])) [0 S4 A32])

[Bug c++/18386] ICE in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 23:45 --- Does this work now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386

[Bug java/18433] gcj compiling resources from a file list doesn't work (ICE)

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/17790] [4.0 Regression] Significant compile time increases for sixtrack with tree LICM and IV optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 00:02 --- Hmm, I found another testcase where we are slow at LIM: loop invariant motion : 2.55 ( 5%) usr 0.40 ( 3%) sys 3.36 ( 4%) wall This is PR8361. Zdenek can you update your patch for the changes where V_

[Bug tree-optimization/17790] [4.0 Regression] Significant compile time increases for sixtrack with tree LICM and IV optimization

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2004-12-06 00:12 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Significant compile time increases for sixtrack with tree LICM and IV optimization > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 200

[Bug fortran/18826] compiler segfault on assign to array

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 00:33 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-12/msg00034.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18826] compiler segfault on assign to array

-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2004-12-04 13:16:38 |2004-12-06 01:28:10 date|

[Bug preprocessor/15167] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Internal compiler error with "#pragma once"

--- Additional Comments From neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 02:26 --- Eric - can you try your testcase on GCC sources as of around the beginning of August 2003? This is when I completely rewrote the whole file lookup mechanism, and contrary to Zack's claims it did work 100% corr

[Bug middle-end/14711] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] ICE in final.c:2117 when compiling a huge source file

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14711

[Bug ada/18816] ACATS c460007 runtime rounding problem

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-

[Bug tree-optimization/18813] not vectorizing obvious loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 04:58 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at

[Bug c/18809] ICE after a couple of errors with a simple invalid C code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:00 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/18755] invariant/constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:01 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/18754] unrolling happens too late/SRA does not happen late enough

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:01 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/18624] cannot detect local variable set but never used

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:02 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/18626] Bootstrap fails on HP-UX 11.11 without HP/ANSI C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:03 --- This is definitely not a gcc bug, I would report this to HP. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18649] terminate called after throwing - IOT/Abort trap (core dumped)

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18649

[Bug driver/18549] -save-temps option ends with corrupt object file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:04 --- Can you add -v and see what happens to be the difference between with and without -save-temps? -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/18821] Please add warning if bits thrown away in integral conversions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:14 --- Confirmed, I thought I saw a bug about this before. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug c/18822] segmentation fault

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/18829] Error signale on an unexisting line

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:15 --- Also can you read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html and provide the preprocessed source? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:20 --- No reason to keep this one open, there is PR 17863 still. Also note I heard from Honza that the tree profiling branch with feedback can optimizate better than with your leafy patch. *** This bug has been

[Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.0 Regression] threefold performance loss

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:20 --- *** Bug 18704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/14022] asm() should start a new line table entry

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:24 --- Add your own debuging info for asm outside a function, there is no way for gcc to know not to do that, anyways this is standard practice as usually you want the asm to recorded as some line and not none.

[Bug libgcj/13892] [win32] UTF8 encoding problem/JRE incompatiblity w/small testcase

-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj Summary|UTF8 encoding problem/JRE |[win32] UTF8 encoding |incompatiblity

[Bug target/14508] ns32k- internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:3887

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 05:37 --- Fixed already on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/15167] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Internal compiler error with "#pragma once"

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 07:11 --- > Eric - can you try your testcase on GCC sources as of around the beginning of > August 2003? You can't reasonably ask this. It is your duty as a cpplib maintainer to do this kind of work. I honestly h

<    1   2