[Bug middle-end/17793] [4.0 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 09:16 --- Subject: Bug 17793 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-23 09:16:47 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gimplify.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/17793] [4.0 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 09:19 --- Initial patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01632.html Final version: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01887.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/18122] New: gfortran internal error in namelist read

I get an internal error reading a namelist, for details see http://bugs.debian.org/277845 $ gfortran-4.0 -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux/4.0.0/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-gxx-include-dir

[Bug libfortran/18122] gfortran internal error in namelist read

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|fortran |libfortran Ever Confirmed|

[Bug java/18119] GCJ imports inner classes too eagarly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 16:13 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug rtl-optimization/18120] -O2 -funroll-loops causes bad loop behavior on fedora

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-23 16:22 --- Can you post the output you get from using -funroll-loops and without? They look the same on my system, so I'm not sure what's wrong. (It's not a fedora system, though, so that may be one of the reasons.) Th

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 18:17 --- The patch is not right as it causes a cross to m68k to fail I will test a different patch which just conditionalize the functions in bitmap.c. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/17407] [4.0 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 18:19 --- I am testing a better patch which fixes this problem in the middle-end in build_array_type instead of in the front-end where I thought the problem was. I am also fixing a C++ template related array probl

[Bug c++/18121] [4.0 regression] ICE with array type

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 18:20 --- Mine, I am testing a patch for this right now. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|una

[Bug middle-end/17407] [4.0 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:05 --- Patch here: which reverts the fix for PR middle-end/12920 and fixes PR middle-end/12920 right and also fixes PR c++/18121. -- What

[Bug c++/18121] [4.0 regression] ICE with array type

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:05 --- Patch here: which reverts the fix for PR middle-end/12920 and fixes PR middle-end/12920 right and also fixes PR middle-end/17407. --

[Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:16 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand)

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:17 --- Subject: Bug 17967 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-23 19:17:09 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/17966] a quadratic behavior in thread_jumps

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:18 --- I think I just fixed the compile time problem in this PR by the patch which I committed for PR 17967, Can you try again? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17966

[Bug bootstrap/13993] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Relative path as srcdir causes problem

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:22 --- Patch posted here: . This is also known as . -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:41 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-10/msg00183.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:44 --- > The patch is not right as it causes a cross to m68k to fail I will test a > different patch which just conditionalize the functions in bitmap.c Death to crosses to m68k ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bu

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-10-23 19:49 --- Only over my dead body. :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:01 --- (From update of attachment 7405) Woops that one did not work at all. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:17 --- New patch which works on a cross to m68k and it is simplier: . -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/13993] [3.4 Regression] Relative path as srcdir causes problem

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:31 --- Daniel since your patch fixes this bug, could you look into backporting it to the 3.4 branch? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug SWING/16697] javax.swing.BoxLayout only wraps GridLayout

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-

[Bug c++/15788] Poor error recovery with if and blocks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15787 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15787] Poor error message with if and blocks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:37 --- *** Bug 15788 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15787

[Bug java/16675] Null parameter values for anonymous constructor invocation require explicit cast

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 20:43 --- We now get an ICE on the mainline (which I think can almost considered a regression) : Test.java: In class 'Test': Test.java: In method 'Test.someTestMethod()': Test.java:5: internal compiler error: in mangl

[Bug tree-optimization/17966] a quadratic behavior in thread_jumps

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-10-23 20:48 --- OK. Now mainline is a lot faster than 3.3 on this testcase. 3.3 takes more than 20 seconds mainlines takes less than 3 seconds Thanks Andrew! -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/17966] a quadratic behavior in thread_jumps

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17966

[Bug tree-optimization/13776] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 4.0-tree-ssa 040120

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 21:26 --- Can you post again the new result as a huge amount has been changed since Auguest 31 and there has been some compile time improvements in that time? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776

[Bug preprocessor/15307] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Preprocessor ICE on invalid input

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 21:34 --- Fixed at least on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0

[Bug tree-optimization/17355] [4.0 Regression] ICE in calculate_live_on_entry, at tree-ssa-live.c:724

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 21:51 --- Does this still happen? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17355

[Bug java/16885] [4.0 Regression] java/awt/Container.java build failure with parallel make

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16885

[Bug c++/18123] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on templated enum

Compiling the following invalid ocde snippet I get an ICE: == template enum E { e }; == bug.cc:1: error: template declaration of 'enum E' bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'declaration', have 'exceptional' (error_

[Bug c++/18123] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on templated enum

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 23:07 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug c++/18123] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on templated enum

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 23:08 --- : Search converges between 2003-10-20-trunk (#382) and 2003-10-23-trunk (#383). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18123

[Bug c++/18124] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE with invalid template template parameter

And another ICE with invalid code and templates: = template class class> class A {}; = bug.cc:1: error: expected identifier before "class" bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected identi

[Bug c++/18124] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE with invalid template template parameter

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 23:14 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/17965] [4.0 Regression] ice in expand_call

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 23:45 --- This 4.0 regression at least on powerpc-darwin. It used to work in 3.3. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 00:59 --- I have a simple patch which just calls fold_stmt on the ASM_EXPR to fold *&a. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:00 --- The other patch will be put on hold for 4.1 (I will create a branch to contain this patch and other patches which are needed for that patch). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17529

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:09 --- New simpler patch: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/17932] gcc-3.4.2 fails to compile glibc-2.3.3

--- Additional Comments From tyrerj at acm dot org 2004-10-24 01:13 --- This bug is marked as a duplicate of a bug that has been marked INVALID. So, this bug isn't a duplicate anymore and should be reopened. -- JRT -- What|Removed

[Bug c/17932] gcc-3.4.2 fails to compile glibc-2.3.3

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:41 --- But it is invalid code, I said read why GCC changed and why this version glibc is wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17932

[Bug c/17932] gcc-3.4.2 fails to compile glibc-2.3.3

--- Additional Comments From tyrerj at acm dot org 2004-10-24 02:55 --- Subject: Re: gcc-3.4.2 fails to compile glibc-2.3.3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:41 > --- > But it is invalid code, I sa

[Bug target/15286] ICE cause by reload

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 02:59 --- pr15286.c:72: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 496 167 381 0 (set (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 1 r1) (const_int 204 [0xcc])) [15 clock_start+0 S4 A8]) (subreg:SI (reg:DI 32 f0) 4)) -1 (nil)

Optimization Bug in g77

I have run into a strange problem with g77 when run with the -O or -O1 option but NOT with -O2, -O3, or no optimization. Below is piece of Fortran code (removed from a larger program) which illustrates the problem. The basic function of the code is to go through a list of data (the RAW array) and