[Bug c/114870] [13 Regression] stddef.h problem with -Wsystem-headers and -std=gnu23 (which is the default since GCC 15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114870 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116108] [12 Regression] GCC crashes on incorrect code with -std=c++20 since r10-4719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116108 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] GCC |[12 Regression] GCC crashes

[Bug c/117745] [12 Regression] GCC hangs with invalid code with sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117745 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] GCC |[12 Regression] GCC hangs

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:599bca27dc37b3f7979bd6af30a357104f2b90c1 commit r16-105-g599bca27dc37b3f7979bd6af30a357104f2b90c1 Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Apr

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a32919a478834f25b6f507ab974f4236fd0d8d7f commit r13-9611-ga32919a478834f25b6f507ab974f4236fd0d8d7f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d70737492a5bdec41c6ae2c351c6882896b16b1 commit r14-11680-g8d70737492a5bdec41c6ae2c351c6882896b16b1 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7748c371c596c6cc131c97a16fec6d39bb7407d commit r12-11067-gb7748c371c596c6cc131c97a16fec6d39bb7407d Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/119916] [15 Regression] folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Can someone reduce it to at least one preprocessed file?

[Bug c++/119916] [15 Regression] folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/119916] [15 Regression] folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15

|earlier): coroutine tests |(2025.04.14.00 and |fail with GCC 15|earlier): coroutine tests ||fail with GCC 15 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This could be a folly bug too ...

[Bug c++/119916] folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916 sin-ack changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/facebook

[Bug c++/119916] New: folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916 Bug ID: 119916 Summary: folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/114870] [13 Regression] stddef.h problem with -Wsystem-headers and -std=gnu23 (which is the default since GCC 15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114870 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7980ce5dcf14eee0b3b937b9783fb02597cef384 commit r13-9593-g7980ce5dcf14eee0b3b937b9783fb02597cef384 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/116108] [12/13 Regression] GCC crashes on incorrect code with -std=c++20 since r10-4719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116108 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28646ac56a32556a53c39750dbe05ffa6e3c4458 commit r13-9580-g28646ac56a32556a53c39750dbe05ffa6e3c4458 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/117745] [12/13 Regression] GCC hangs with invalid code with sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117745 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec1614b4ee585e7dea657070d5c6cea99444e22a commit r13-9575-gec1614b4ee585e7dea657070d5c6cea99444e22a Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/118605] gcc/tree-assume.cc:108: dangling field problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78655] gcc doesn't exploit the fact that the result of pointer addition can not be nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 --- Comment #19 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #18) > FWIW, that would be my take... NULL + anything would be UB. Assuming of > course 0 is not an addressable value. N3322 clarifies this (NULL + 0 becomes well-defi

[Bug libstdc++/119888] GCC 15.x regression: std::string_view as template parameter incorrectly decays to char const*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note clang using GCC's trunk libstdc++ has the same issue so it is NOT a front-end bug.

[Bug c++/119888] New: GCC 15.x regression: std::string_view as template parameter incorrectly decays to char const*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888 Bug ID: 119888 Summary: GCC 15.x regression: std::string_view as template parameter incorrectly decays to char const* Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #34 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Thanks Andrew for the reply. In that case, the issue is probably invalid because checkpoint4.cpp also has several reinterpret_casts casting to things involving templates. Too bad, LLVM's -fsanitize=un

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to mcccs from comment #31) > Created attachment 61160 [details] > minimized.cpp > > GCC -O1 -fstrict-aliasing or -O2 or -O3: aborts > > I've attached the minimized huma

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #32 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Oh no I'm so sorry all! I tried to set the previous attachment obsolete unfortunately it quoted all of it and posted here! Sorry for the tall thread

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #31 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Created attachment 61160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61160&action=edit minimized.cpp GCC -O1 -fstrict-aliasing or -O2 or -O3: aborts I've attached the min

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61145|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

|--- |16.0 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Fixed for GCC 16.

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4849ec79873fa6de98436deda47e19cbac32ef commit r16-23-g7b4849ec79873fa6de98436deda47e19cbac32ef Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 commit r16-22-g94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- The aliasing improvement patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681345.html The STRING_CST part was already approved and I will be pushing it tomorrow.

[Bug tree-optimization/97640] GCC doesn't optimize-out outside-affecting lambdas within y-combinator while clang does.

||119493 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- So there are a couple of things here. One is PR 119493 (which will improve -O2 code

[Bug c++/119850] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstrict-overflow" is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119850 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/119850] New: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstrict-overflow" is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119850 Bug ID: 119850 Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstrict-overflow" is ignored Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #27 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22fe83d6fc9f59311241c981bcad58b61e2056d4 commit r15-9548-g22fe83d6fc9f59311241c981bcad58b61e2056d4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date

[Bug tree-optimization/97640] GCC doesn't optimize-out outside-affecting lambdas within y-combinator while clang does.

||2025-04-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. We get close at -O3 (even at -O2 we are close). GCC even gets the tail call at -O2 which LLVM does not.

[Bug c/67224] UTF-8 support for identifier names in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224 Neil Booth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neilb at protonmail dot ch --- Comment #38

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3e721f489ebed71fccb4a2ebb5add92e8ddc206 commit r15-9537-gc3e721f489ebed71fccb4a2ebb5add92e8ddc206 Author: Bob Dubner Date: Wed

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Bug 119211 depends on bug 119759, which changed state. Bug 119759 Summary: LICENSE file in gcc/cobol https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 What|Removed |Added

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #29 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- fails with even -O1 -fstrict-aliasing -fcode-hoisting

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #28 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Created attachment 61145 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61145&action=edit 27k bytes reduced testcase further reduced with c-reduce. verified with various LLVM fsanitize's

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fdb0145fb9499f5db9e27f775895ce4a39215e4 commit r15-9533-g5fdb0145fb9499f5db9e27f775895ce4a39215e4 Author: Jason Merrill Date

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61136|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #25 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Created attachment 61143 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61143&action=edit reduced test

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks, confirmed it is late_combine that changes (insn 1817 227 1735 42 (set (reg:DI 2 %r2 [orig:250 _176 ] [250]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) "../src/hb-algs.hh":996:17 1811 {*movdi_64} (nil)) (note

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[12/13/14/15 Regression] |pragma GCC target applied

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

preprocessed input which fails if gcc was build for z900 using command line: c++ -std=c++11 -fno-exceptions -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fPIC hb-subset.ii -c -o foo.o In the meantime I will reduce, too.

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

be > a P1) or not? I have tried the same command line with GCC 14 and it works. [alma8 build]$ fl_gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=fl_gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/env/s390x-linux-gcc14-alma8/devel/libexec/gcc/s390x-ibm-linux-gnu/14.2.1/lto-wrapper Target: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu C

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #20 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Created attachment 61141 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61141&action=edit preprocessed

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #19 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61140 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61140&action=edit dump part3

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #18 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61139&action=edit dump part2

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #17 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61138&action=edit dump part1

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, I'm afraid my bootstrap/regtest will take until tomorrow, https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1218/131601218/build.log it is only make -j3 (and eventhough I've disabled LTO bootstrap, it wi

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source? So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be a P1) or not?

[Bug target/118518] gcc 14.2.1 nvptx cross compiler complains about alias definitions in a struct with two constructors that are not aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518 Bug 118518 depends on bug 106445, which changed state. Bug 106445 Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting lost https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/102012] GCC accepts any non-bool atomic constraint type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102012 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #14 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #12) > Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? > (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.) [alma8 bui

[Bug target/118518] gcc 14.2.1 nvptx cross compiler complains about alias definitions in a struct with two constructors that are not aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518 Bug 118518 depends on bug 117010, which changed state. Bug 117010 Summary: [nvptx] Incorrect ptx code-gen for C++ code with templates https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.)

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, if even that is too large, guess just grep -C50 'clrmem_short' hb-subset.cc.*[0-9]r.* might be good enough.

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

is late combine that propagates the constant? > > > > > > Can you compile with additional -da (assuming you still hit the ICE) and > > > attach all the *.[0-9]*r.* dumps? > > > > Thanks, I'll try. (It's a qemu system, compiling GCC takes about 24 hour

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Use xz -9e to compress it afterwards. And remove the vartrack one, there is nothing interesting in there for this PR.

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Agreed, possibly the missing explicit LICENSE file in the libgcobol runtime might be good to fix (by simply "moving" LICENSE from the FE to libgcobol?)

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

? Thanks, I'll try. (It's a qemu system, compiling GCC takes about 24 hours.)

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

-da (assuming you still hit the ICE) and > > attach all the *.[0-9]*r.* dumps? > > Thanks, I'll try. (It's a qemu system, compiling GCC takes about 24 hours.) For the -da files I meant with your current compiler, just retry the fl_gxx -Isrc/libharfbuzz-subset.so.0.61101.0.p -I

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61136 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61136&action=edit gcc15-pr119834.patch Untested patch (except on a short testcase with memset (ptr, 0, 17); to verify that *clrm

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #5 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > Can you show the full command line at least please? Need the flags. fl_gxx -Isrc/libharfbuzz-subset.so.0.61101.0.p -Isrc -I../harfbuzz-11.0.1/src -I. -I../

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, s390 is the only backend which does this, I see (clobber (scratch)) on ia64 too, but it is there in the replacement of define_split, not in the matching part.

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Can you show the full command line at least please? Need the flags.

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

|Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 |[15 regression] Compiling |with gcc 15 20250413 fails |harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 |on s390x|20250413 fails on s390x Target Milestone|--- |15.0 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- I can try

[Bug target/119834] New: Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Bug ID: 119834 Summary: Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/119828] RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/119828] RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Andrew P

[Bug c/119828] New: RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828 Bug ID: 119828 Summary: RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Bug 119211 depends on bug 119302, which changed state. Bug 119302 Summary: cobol.3 manpage is installed without program_transform_name https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/119298] [15 Regression] 538.imagick_r is faster when compiled with GCC 14.2 and -Ofast -flto -march=native than with master on Zen5 since r15-3441-g4292297a0f938f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34 commit r15-9495-ge2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Tue

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7a2f0aa6bd28c054cecfda9d2c499a304cd4c2a commit r15-9472-gf7a2f0aa6bd28c054cecfda9d2c499a304cd4c2a Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug target/119760] GCC does not implement intrinsics for Vector Multiply-by-10 Unsigned Quadword and varients

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119760 --- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Likely because GCC doesn't know anything about BCD (no BCD "modes", builtins > or optabs or direct internal functions). As I stated th

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Bug 119211 depends on bug 119777, which changed state. Bug 119777 Summary: [15 Regression] COBOL '-fsyntax-only', 'RejectNegative' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119777 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Bug 119211 depends on bug 119776, which changed state. Bug 119776 Summary: COBOL '-fmax-errors', 'Separate' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119776 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 --- Comment #3 from Simon Sobisch --- Note "Copyright (c) 2021-2025 Symas Corporation" is also part of several files, for example gcc/gcobol/parse.y

[Bug target/119760] GCC does not implement intrinsics for Vector Multiply-by-10 Unsigned Quadword and varients

from Richard Biener --- Likely because GCC doesn't know anything about BCD (no BCD "modes", builtins or optabs or direct internal functions).

[Bug other/119788] "Known Causes of Trouble with GCC" manual chapter is super bit-rotten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119788 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I suggest to send patches to remove the most obvious rotten bits and push those after 24h of no comments. If there's (almost) nothing left, post a patch to remove the whole chapter and see if there's any f

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think we allow license files in parts that are managed elsewhere. And we do want to have license files in runtime libraries, but libgcobol lacks one. So possibly we should simply move the file ...

[Bug target/119673] GCC with Win32 thread model cannot compile 'std' module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119673 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c82694319a168a1369bafa4c6e21b664a5d0bc8 commit r15-9419-g5c82694319a168a1369bafa4c6e21b664a5d0bc8 Author: Eric Botcazou Date

[Bug target/119673] GCC with Win32 thread model cannot compile 'std' module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119673 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/119673] GCC with Win32 thread model cannot compile 'std' module

||{x86_64,i686}-w64-mingw32 Summary|MinGW-w64 GCC with win32|GCC with Win32 thread model |thread model cannot compile |cannot compile 'std' module |'std' module|

[Bug other/119788] New: "Known Causes of Trouble with GCC" manual chapter is super bit-rotten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119788 Bug ID: 119788 Summary: "Known Causes of Trouble with GCC" manual chapter is super bit-rotten Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119778] New: gcc gimple crashes on some setjmp/longjmp code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Bug ID: 119778 Summary: gcc gimple crashes on some setjmp/longjmp code Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #27 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- *sorry I meant 60k bytes not lines

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #26 from Sam James --- (In reply to mcccs from comment #25) > I used creduce and some de-namespacing and brought it to about 60k lines, I > hope to post the checkpoint soon Thank you! Even partial reductions often help a lot (though

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/119760] New: GCC does not implement intrinsics for Vector Multiply-by-10 Unsigned Quadword and varients

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119760 Bug ID: 119760 Summary: GCC does not implement intrinsics for Vector Multiply-by-10 Unsigned Quadword and varients Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >