--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 20:21 ---
Closing 4.2 branch, fixed in 4.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 21:48 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 17:25 ---
Slightly modified version of this patch checked in on trunk.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 17:24 ---
Subject: Bug 30363
Author: tromey
Date: Mon Jan 7 17:23:40 2008
New Revision: 131379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131379
Log:
libcpp
2008-01-07 Fred Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR pr
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 04:09 ---
I'll review the patch at least.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:18 ---
Open regression with no activity since February 14. Ping?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30363
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30363
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30363
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30363
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 21:23 ---
won't fix in GCC-4.0.x. Adjusting milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from fnf at specifixinc dot com 2007-01-07 01:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12867)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12867&action=view)
Patch to fix reported problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30363
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-07 01:09 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 3.2.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
the associated comments. Either the
current gcc testsuite is wrong in how it tests for this whitespace, or
gcc 2.95.3 is wrong. It's not clear to me which behavior is more correct.
--
Summary: Support for -traditional-cpp is incomplete in current
gcc relative t
Given the following test case:
#define f(x, y) "x y"
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
const char *str1 = f("a", "\"a\"");
const char *str2 = f( \t, " \t");
if (strcmp (str1, "\"a\" \"\\\"a\\\"\""))
abort ();
if (strcmp (str2, "\t \" \\t\""))
abor
14 matches
Mail list logo