Re: Optimisation Problem

2011-04-17 Thread vikramsp
Thanks Eric Eric Botcazou-3 wrote: > >> But i wanted to try them indivisually. Is there any method to do so? > > The compiler doesn't optimize anything if you don't pass at least -O. > > -- > Eric Botcazou > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Optimisation-Problem-tp

Re: Optimisation Problem

2011-04-06 Thread Eric Botcazou
> But i wanted to try them indivisually. Is there any method to do so? The compiler doesn't optimize anything if you don't pass at least -O. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Optimisation Problem

2011-04-06 Thread vikramsp
Thanks Eric. But i wanted to try them indivisually. Is there any method to do so? Regards - vikramsp Eric Botcazou-3 wrote: > >> hello there... i am trying my hands on gcc optimisations options. >> i tried e.g. -finline-functions, -funroll-loops and the likes but none >> worked for me >> for ex.

Re: Optimisation Problem

2011-04-06 Thread Eric Botcazou
> hello there... i am trying my hands on gcc optimisations options. > i tried e.g. -finline-functions, -funroll-loops and the likes but none > worked for me > for ex. i tried -funroll-loops for code > for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) > a[i] = i; Try -O -funroll-loops. -- Eric Botcazou