On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Graham Stott wrote:
All,
If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in
two steps
(i.e. hwi = (hwi >> (shift - 1)) >> 1) as done elsewhere to avoid the
potential warning.
The only reason why it is bogus is because well it is dead code :).
All,
If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in two steps
(i.e. hwi = (hwi >> (shift - 1)) >> 1) as done elsewhere to avoid the
potential warning.
--- joseph at codesourcery dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot co
