https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120536
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
My reduced testcase has been failing even in GCC 3.4.6.
Starting in GCC 4.7.1 GCC does give an error message before the ICE though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120594
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120595
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61603
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61603&action=edit
Testcase that is valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120339
--- Comment #1 from MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR ---
Another example of this CE showing that it worked before 14.1 and compiled
successfully:
https://godbolt.org/z/hK5G1av89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120595
Bug ID: 120595
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_stmt, at
cp/pt.cc:19111 since 7.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120594
Bug ID: 120594
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
template_class_depth, at cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120593
Bug ID: 120593
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.cc:2662 since 13.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|13.5
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119651
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|13.5
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|13.5
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120536
Bug ID: 120536
Summary: internal compiler error: in build_over_call, at
cp/call.cc:10918 since gcc 5.5
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120534
Bug ID: 120534
Summary: internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at
cp/constexpr.cc:1789 since gcc 5.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2c8d3064764f1f4bfd41d8791d06f2206b42780
commit r16-1036-gb2c8d3064764f1f4bfd41d8791d06f2206b42780
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: T
|internal compiler error: in |compiler error: in
|composite_type_internal, at |composite_type_internal, at
|c/c-typeck.cc:848 |c/c-typeck.cc:848
--- Comment #7 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed on trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e0f963bcfbfce351dd4aad82e6dbc6fc84a0724
commit r16-982-g0e0f963bcfbfce351dd4aad82e6dbc6fc84a0724
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
--- Comment #4 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/685120.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
--- Comment #5 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Turns out one can trigger this also using statement expressions:
https://godbolt.org/z/3M8en31zd
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/685119.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
--- Comment #4 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61548&action=edit
patch for trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
--- Comment #3 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61547
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61547&action=edit
patch for trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|14.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c79c0992acd2244e51d34f8e5dc33f13527cee3
commit r13-9702-g5c79c0992acd2244e51d34f8e5dc33f13527cee3
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af
commit r15-9724-ga8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b
commit r16-856-g66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117877
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.4
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89867
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lloyd at randombit dot net
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119520
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119520
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Nesting one definition of struct A inside another is never valid (and the
godbolt link shows the expected "nested redefinition" error that the PR doesn't
quote).
|NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-21
Summary|internal compiler error:|[14/15/16 Regression]
|error reporting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[14/15/16 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120382
Bug ID: 120382
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
extended_tree, at tree.h:6562
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
Bug ID: 120381
Summary: internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal,
at c/c-typeck.cc:848
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380
Bug ID: 120380
Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines
re-entered
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
/16 Regression] internal |[15 Regression] internal
|compiler error: |compiler error:
|Segmentation fault during |Segmentation fault during
|GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 |GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0
|only in version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95c74f354ae3186e84fbada22d2e7f3845dbb659
commit r16-769-g95c74f354ae3186e84fbada22d2e7f3845dbb659
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/684319.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61482&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think I know the issue. it comes down to the LHS of __builtin_cabs is NULL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61481
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61481&action=edit
No header version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Bug ID: 120369
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during
GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
--- Comment #1 from ACB ---
Created attachment 61476
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61476&action=edit
freport-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
Bug ID: 120363
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_node, at
cp/module.cc:9956
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120337
--- Comment #1 from MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR ---
I have found with a program that gives a similar ICE, if you use c++23 instead
of c++20 it gives "g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal
terminated program cc1plus":
``
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120346
Bug ID: 120346
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
target_expr, have error_mark in convert_like_internal,
at cp/call.cc:9037 since 14.1
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120339
Bug ID: 120339
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
diagnostic_impl since version 14.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120337
Bug ID: 120337
Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines
re-entered. tuple library since version 14.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120338
Bug ID: 120338
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_or_defer_fn_1, at
cp/semantics.cc:5479 with main and delete since
version 15.1
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120336
Bug ID: 120336
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree
that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have
'error_mark' in decl_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
compiler error: in |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]
|lookup_base, at |internal compiler error: in
|cp/search.cc:251|lookup_base, at
||cp/search.cc:251
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin ---
Yes.
Test results with LRA at git revision d0571638a6b are here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-May/847159.html
I've just about finished check with reload at same commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> I was not able to reproduce this on c8000
So, the LRA-enabled bootstrap works for you without any problems?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
compiler error: in |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]
|tsubst_expr, at |internal compiler error: in
|cp/pt.cc:21618 since clang |tsubst_expr when trying to
|10 using -std=c++20 |call a concept inside a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120274
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61451&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120274
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-17
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61449|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61449
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61449&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
--- Comment #2 from Andr
compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains
'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in decl_internal_context_p, at
cp/tree.cc:3880
From:
:3:3: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains
'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120314
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61448
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61448&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120314
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing. It is taking longer because I don't want to run into any other
unrelated issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
I was not able to reproduce this on c8000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96233
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc_assert (cur_cfa->reg == XEXP (src, 0));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120316
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* Saving a register in a register. */
gcc_assert (!fixed_regs [REGNO (dest)]
/* For the SPARC and its register window. */
||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120316
Bug ID: 120316
Summary: GCC-15.1.0 for Target RX: internal compiler error: in
dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1854
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
I was able to reproduce this on c8000. Maybe this is a qemu issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120314
Bug ID: 120314
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree
that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have
'error_mark' in decl_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120312
Bug ID: 120312
Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines
re-entered. in build_array_type_1 since 4.7.1 until
trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120311
Bug ID: 120311
Summary: internal compiler error: in lookup_base, at
cp/search.cc:251
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120309
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120309
Bug ID: 120309
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in
groktypename since gcc 15.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess it depends on what approach is used to fix this.
If just handling error_mark_node gracefully during the mangling (emit something
in that case, what exactly doesn't matter much) and/or somehow figure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Should this be two separate bugs? There might be one that's been there since
gcc-5 but there's still a newer one that's is a gcc-15 regression.
It's only ice-on-invalid-code though, so I guess it's not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809
--- Comment #4 from Simon Sobisch ---
Looking forward to have a compiler targetting ISO COBOL to support that one day
:-)
Note: in C this would be a struct with int : 1, included, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 9629 matches
Mail list logo