[Bug c/101440] Documentation bug for __attribute__ ((access))

2025-04-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101440 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4590a31f81ae18e0d887c1a56f510d22754f31ed commit r15-9165-g4590a31f81ae18e0d887c1a56f510d22754f31ed Author: Sandra Loosemore Dat

[Bug c/101440] Documentation bug for __attribute__ ((access))

2025-04-02 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101440 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89632] documentation bug

2024-12-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Date: Thu Dec 19 00:43:11 2024 + Fortran: Clean up -funderscoring and -fsecond-underscore docs [PR51820] This is a long-standing documentation bug in the Fortran manual, initially reported in 2012 as PR51820, with a quick fix applied later for PR109216. The patch here

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-09-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-09-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03b8e26897fbddec10a703cf518280af675e6458 commit r9-9715-g03b8e26897fbddec10a703cf518280af675e6458 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-09-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9f52acb7dc74fb7b4591f98d81cdcf54b36df38 commit r10-10102-gb9f52acb7dc74fb7b4591f98d81cdcf54b36df38 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-09-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7b2e9bd1a3cdb502bfd837d56ef809817ef0db7 commit r11-8974-gd7b2e9bd1a3cdb502bfd837d56ef809817ef0db7 Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-09-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c64582372cf445eabc4f9e99def7e33fb0270ee commit r12-3423-g3c64582372cf445eabc4f9e99def7e33fb0270ee Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-08-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578453.html

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-08-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-31 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/60318] Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2021-08-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedo | |cs/gcc/Copy-Assignme

[Bug d/101440] New: Documentation bug for __attribute__ ((access))

2021-07-13 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101440 Bug ID: 101440 Summary: Documentation bug for __attribute__ ((access)) Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.1.0/gcc/Common-F

[Bug fortran/89632] documentation bug

2019-03-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89632 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/89632] New: documentation bug

2019-03-08 Thread kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89632 Bug ID: 89632 Summary: documentation bug Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee

[Bug c++/60318] New: Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases

2014-02-22 Thread JuergenGCC at bund dot us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318 Bug ID: 60318 Summary: Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/25653] Documentation bug in ext/stdio_filebuf.h

2006-01-03 Thread rleigh at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from rleigh at debian dot org 2006-01-03 23:49 --- Looking at _M_cfile_created as you suggested, it does look like the documentation is correct as it stands. Sorry for the waste of time. Thanks, Roger -- rleigh at debian dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/25653] Documentation bug in ext/stdio_filebuf.h

2006-01-03 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-03 22:42 --- (In reply to comment #1) > On further investigation, it looks like when a stdio_filebuf is destroyed, > this will ultimately invoke __basic_file::close(). This calls fclose(). I think this is not true for the constructor a

[Bug libstdc++/25653] Documentation bug in ext/stdio_filebuf.h

2006-01-03 Thread rleigh at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from rleigh at debian dot org 2006-01-03 20:52 --- On further investigation, it looks like when a stdio_filebuf is destroyed, this will ultimately invoke __basic_file::close(). This calls fclose(). If an fd is used, fdopen() is called to create a __c_file*. If this is c

[Bug libstdc++/25653] New: Documentation bug in ext/stdio_filebuf.h

2006-01-03 Thread rleigh at debian dot org
ssumption I was passing ownership of the fd to this streambuf, and not closing it by hand. Is this a documentation bug? I've checked , and I can't see any referece to close(). The docs for the FILE* ctor say " The FILE* will **not** be automatically closed when the stdio_filebuf is c

Documentation "bug"

2005-01-25 Thread Ethan Tira-Thompson
Regarding: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2/gcc/Function-Attributes.html#Function%20Attributes When using an attribute that take parameter arguments, such as the format attribute, one needs to start counting parameters at *2* in C++ because (i'm assuming here) 'this' (the current object's ad