[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-06-07 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Bug bootstrap/56714

2013-04-29 Thread Kai-Uwe Eckhardt
The same error appears on NetBSD 6.99.19 because __always_inline is already defined without the inline keyword in sys/cdefs.h. Including the inline keyword in the macro wouldn't work if the macro is used at the very end of a declaration like in: inline void foo (const char) __always_inline; To co

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-31 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 --- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-31 21:51:44 UTC --- > Was there a problem the other bug report about this? Not that I can see. That other report was just a duplicate coming a few days later.

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-31 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-31 21:50:42 UTC --- *** Bug 56784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-31 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-unknown-freebsd*

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-31 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-31 20:08:22 UTC --- I guess it is really complaining about the lack of inline modifier. __attribute__((__always_inline__)) bool atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag* __a, memory

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-30 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 --- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-30 23:35:26 UTC --- Created attachment 29756 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29756 Pre-processed source aatree.ii All those always_inline attributes seem to come from libitm

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-30 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

2013-03-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot

[Bug bootstrap/56714] New: [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline f unction might not be inlinable

2013-03-24 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Bug #: 56714 Summary: [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline f unction might not be inlinable Classification: Unclassified