https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25119
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07
20:43:45 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 7 20:43:43 2011
New Revision: 176010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176010
Log:
PR target/49660
* config/sparc/sol2.h [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07
20:37:02 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 7 20:36:59 2011
New Revision: 176008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176008
Log:
PR target/49660
* config/sparc/sol2.h [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07
20:41:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 7 20:41:10 2011
New Revision: 176009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176009
Log:
PR target/49660
* config/sparc/sol2.h [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-06 15:24:51 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06
> 15:16:47 UTC ---
> I think the proper handling of this is part of the --with-cpu-(32|64)
> framework.
No idea,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 15:16:47
UTC ---
I think the proper handling of this is part of the --with-cpu-(32|64)
framework.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-06 15:01:11 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06
> 14:52:04 UTC ---
> I think you want to implement --with-cpu-(32|64) like x86 and powerpc.
This might be a possi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 14:52:04
UTC ---
I think you want to implement --with-cpu-(32|64) like x86 and powerpc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660
Summary: 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on
Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
Hi,
How do I get a 64-bit gcc (compiles 64 bit
apps for Intel Core 2 Duo)?
Thanks,
--Stuart
--- Comment #8 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 00:35
---
Subject: Bug 26892
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Fri Dec 1 00:32:38 2006
New Revision: 119391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119391
Log:
Merged revisions 118545-118650 via svnmerge from
svn+
--- Comment #7 from echristo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 00:02
---
Subject: Bug 26892
Author: echristo
Date: Fri Nov 10 00:02:21 2006
New Revision: 118634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118634
Log:
2006-11-09 Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from echristo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 23:57
---
Subject: Bug 26892
Author: echristo
Date: Thu Nov 9 23:56:57 2006
New Revision: 118633
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118633
Log:
2006-11-09 Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-11-09 23:51 ---
This appears to work with the change to add powerpc64-darwin support.
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-04-01 00:48
---
Subject: Re: Can't compile a 64-bit gcc
On Mar 31, 2006, at 6:45 PM, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu wrote:
> So it appears that configure in 4.1.0 realizes that the libiconv on
> powerpc-darw
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-04-01 00:45
---
Subject: Re: Can't compile a 64-bit gcc
OK, I'll try to give a bit more data and make a more intelligent
comment.
I tried to configure and build mainline with this command:
/bin/rm -rf *; env CC=
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-03-31 03:01
---
Subject: Re: Can't compile a 64-bit gcc
I don't know.
Why does 4.2 use libiconv and 4.1 not use it? (I'm presuming that 4.1
doesn't use it because I was able to build a 64-bit gcc on
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 21:46 ---
ld64 warning: in /usr/lib/libiconv.dylib, file does not contain requested
architecture
ld64 warning: in /usr/lib/libiconv.dylib, file does not contain requested
architecture
I don't think there is anything GCC can d
o)
__cpp_convert_input in libcpp.a(charset.o)
__nl_free_domain_conv in libintl.a(loadmsgcat.o)
_libiconv_open, referenced from:
_init_iconv_desc in libcpp.a(charset.o)
__nl_init_domain_conv in libintl.a(loadmsgcat.o)
_libiconv_set_relocation_prefix, referenced from:
_libintl_set_r
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-01-04 09:37:54
date||
Summary|bootstrap failure on AIX 5.3|64-bit GCC on
22 matches
Mail list logo