https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #21 from Jon Grant ---
Hi Gerald
Thank you for replying.
Ok, good its ok on GCC side. Thank you for checking on your machine.
Well done for sorting this!
Regards, Jonny
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #20 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Created attachment 39553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39553&action=edit
Firefox font configuratoin
(In reply to Jon Grant from comment #18)
> Just looking at this page:
>
> https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #19 from Jon Grant ---
Created attachment 39552
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39552&action=edit
Firefox screenshot 4 September 2016
Shows the small text visible still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #18 from Jon Grant ---
Just looking at this page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Enumerator-Attributes.html#Enumerator-Attributes
The "deprecated" word appears to be smaller (like 9pt, compared to 11pt regular
I estimate). I', u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #16 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gerald
Date: Sun Sep 4 19:38:05 2016
New Revision: 239981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR documentation/50642
* update_web_docs_sv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jon Grant from comment #13)
> Hello
> Could this be committed to the trunk please?
Not everybody reads all messages in bugzilla. Patches go to gcc-patches. See
comment #8. CC Gerald (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #13 from Jon Grant ---
Hello
Could this be committed to the trunk please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #12 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Hi,
- Original Message -
| From: "jg at jguk dot org"
|
| The problem is still visible for me with default new Firefox profile:
\--
The patch has not yet been committed to the trunk.
SK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #11 from Jon Grant ---
Hi
The problem is still visible for me with default new Firefox profile:
Screenshot:
http://justpaste.it/2zap
Who can re-generate the website?
Regards
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-05-06
10:33:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 30037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30037
Normal font for smallexample using update_web_docs_svn script
As mentioned in the gcc-pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-04-30
09:54:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 29978
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29978
Override @smallexample attributes
The attached patch overrides the default @smallexample a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #6 from Jon Grant 2011-11-12 22:15:36 UTC ---
Could this be followed up with the proposed change implemented?
pre.smallexample { font-size:normal }
Thanks, Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-07
17:17:30 UTC ---
Legibility first. There is no need to be more catholic than the pope ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2011-10-07 16:33:46
UTC ---
A @smallexample is supposed to be smaller than an @example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-07
00:49:31 UTC ---
I think this PR is valid, I don't see why the fixed-width text has to be so
small. I *can* read it at that size, but I'd prefer if it was the same size as
the text in a proportional
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-07
00:21:00 UTC ---
I must say, I have been using Firefox on Linux exclusively for years, and
years, and never had this issue with my normal setup in terms of font size (the
same I use for, I don't know,
21 matches
Mail list logo