[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2013-01-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-21 11:14:43 UTC --- In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources: http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/au

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2013-01-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2013-01-21 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-12-08 19:34:48 |2013-01-21 19:34:48

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-12-09 13:40 --- Subject: Re: dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??? This manual is apparently not available online. Keep > the cross But

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-09 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 09:00 --- Something as simple as this would already fix the broken link. Index: gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi === --- gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi(revision 142582) +++

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-08 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-12-08 21:00 --- Subject: Re: dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference. The reference is to a whole manu

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:40 --- Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference. And I was under the impression that there was a kind-of "you broke it, you fix it rule" with GCC bugs. Am I wrong or does this just not apply to you? -

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-08 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:29 --- As I explained in 2003, this is a web problem, not a source code bug, and so not a regression. It is a new feature of the manual such that each user of the manual may need to do something to take advantage of the new

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2008-12-08 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-08 19:34 --- | \ ' / -- (*) -- >*< >0<@< >>>@<<

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

2006-06-12 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-12 07:18 --- (In reply to comment #0) still failing ... since it has been opened about 2.5y ago, should it be closed as wontfix ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821