https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
>
> --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> With the follow-on mentio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> What do you mean with "twice"? We seem to do interleaving here (on x86_64)
> but since 'v' and 'i' have different types they do not belong to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98542
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
What do you mean with "twice"? We seem to do interleaving here (on x86_64)
but since 'v' and 'i' have different types they do not belong to the same
interleaving chain (but we have two that "interleave" - h
