https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d2e64c4a2892ca8889002b1a3dd713471ef9fab
commit r10-9225-g8d2e64c4a2892ca8889002b1a3dd713471ef9fab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Hopefully fixed for GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ddee425b8c427d3cc13c49b26f442313e239572
commit r11-6473-g4ddee425b8c427d3cc13c49b26f442313e239572
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
note the BB rank assignment via ++rank << 16 implies no more than 1 << 15
SSA defs in each BB as well. It would be better to simply assign the BB rank
while traversing the IL in a DFS walk (SSA names pick u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, sorry, it is just SSA_NAMEs which are default definitions, so that is
less than that; more than 32768 parameters to a function are unlikely, but one
can have thousands of uninitialized SSA_NAMEs, or one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
