https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe78528c05fdd562f21e12675781473b0fbe892e
commit r11-5957-gfe78528c05fdd562f21e12675781473b0fbe892e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It shouldn't be added to match.pd, the check as written in the source is
certainly better for other optimization passes.
For PR95853 I've added recently a widening_mul (i.e. very late pass, almost
before expa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, it needs the addition too, so I think this can't be done in match.pd,
> but would need to be done in some other pass (not sure which, perhaps
> phiopt?).
May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, it needs the addition too, so I think this can't be done in match.pd,
> but would need to be done in some other pass (not sure which, perhaps
> phiopt?).
No,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, it needs the addition too, so I think this can't be done in match.pd, but
would need to be done in some other pass (not sure which, perhaps phiopt?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirme
