https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Oct 8 21:53:03 2019
New Revision: 276722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276722&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-08 Dmitrij Pochepko
PR tree-optimization/90836
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Oct 8 21:50:05 2019
New Revision: 276721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-08 Dmitrij Pochepko
PR tree-optimization/90836
* g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836
--- Comment #2 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> While it could be matched in match.pd variations would be quite a lot.
> I don't see where else it fits (apart from forwprop which already does
> fancy pattern matching.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|