[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

2020-05-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

2020-05-11 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

2019-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, wrong-code Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

2019-05-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > If the size of int and void* are the same, I would say there is an issue. > Otherwise there is undefined behavior going on. > > The reason for the difference in

[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

2019-05-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- If the size of int and void* are the same, I would say there is an issue. Otherwise there is undefined behavior going on. The reason for the difference in sizes matter is because you write via void* and then