https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||javier.martinez.bugzilla@gm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
--- Comment #11 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1 of bug 94416)
> I think there's a duplicate somewhere. We currently cannot encode "restrict"
> into the "accesses" implied by a call.
>
> Note there's s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@nieper-wisskirchen.de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, eyalroz at technion dot ac.il wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
>
> --- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Thanks to a friendly StackOverflow user, I should also report that (about) the
same code produces the same compiler behavior disparity for proper C:
https://godbolt.org/z/kVYqp8
with the slight modificatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> exposing __restrict to the IL).
Is "IL" an acronym for "Intermediate Language"? Remember many bug
posters/readers are not GCC developers and don't know all th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Hmm indeed they are different (it would have been clearer to omit const in the
initial testcase). I couldn't find an obvious duplicate in bug 49774.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICAT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
Sta
12 matches
Mail list logo