https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> You're right, a strict reading of the standard does imply that the pointer
> argument to strlen could point to the integer. I keep forgetting about this
> unfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
You're right, a strict reading of the standard does imply that the pointer
argument to strlen could point to the integer. I keep forgetting about this
unfortunate loophole. Ironically, the equivalent code us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It works if you make n0 static btw. (only in late FRE because early
TREE_ADDRESSABLE of n0 is not yet cleared)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
