https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 24 09:42:19 2018
New Revision: 265455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265455&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 44886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44886&action=edit
patch I am testing
Patch I am testing - sorry for the delay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #5 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
Hi, any news of this for GCC 9? I'm guessing it requires a bit more changes,
hopefully not forgotten though. Currently I'm using a custom patched GCC 8 for
it (and to test plugin behavior with it) but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #4 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
Thanks, it's quite useful in some "meta asm" cases (in conjunction with
plugins, asms can be useful since you can't add builtins). Or when doing custom
calls in asms (or syscalls, etc) and you know what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, katsunori.kumatani at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
>
> --- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani
> ---
> I'm not familiar with tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
I'm not familiar with tree-ssa-structalias, but it appears to me that the "fix"
is quite simple? Or am I missing something? Here's the snippet from it, updated
with my attempt:
if (restrict_var)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
