https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80874
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80874
--- Comment #1 from denis.campredon at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, minmax3 should not produce the same asm, since minmax return a pair of
const reference.
But still the code is less than optimal.
One part it is because gcc might be because gcc is not
